QUICKSAND, in films, TV, novels, & reality

Jeffbert

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2011
Messages
2,320
:eek: This is the thing that most terrified me as a child. That the ground itself could simply swallow me, was just too much. I have had no encounters with the real thing, though; but have read about some who claim they did. So, the MYTH BUSTERS did a show about it, which I found inadequate, as they talked about buoyancy but did not discuss backpacks, heavy clothing, or other weights. The big guy pushed the little guy down, released him, and he popped up again, demonstrating the buoyancy. They had spoken to a geologist about grades of sand most likely found in QS, etc., but I think they used too high a volume of water injected, as it was very thin. There was a History Channel program about a year ago that also included homemade QS. These guys' QS was so thick, that they simply could not pull their guy out of it. In an episode of BATMAN, the RIDDLER (this one time portrayed by the ADDAMS FAMILY GUY) had made a QS trap, and, though stuck in it, Batman gave Robin hope for survival by mentioning buoyancy.

So, anyway, as an adult, I still find it (on TV, etc.) usually makes my stomach tighten. I recall reading NEW ARABIAN NIGHTS, one of whose stories featured QS, as I had done a text search on a classic literature CD for QS (among other things), & that it took me a very long time to finish the story because it upset me, just thinking about it. :LOL: :p Anyway, I have seen all TARZAN movies but TARZAN'S THREE CHALLENGES, in no fewer than three of them, the bad guy dies in QS. Bela Lugosi's one portrayal of the Frankenstein Monster dies in QS, as do more than a few characters in movies. In the film, WOMAN IN THE DUNES which TCM will show 3:45 PM Friday, 03/03/2017, the QS is depicted very differently than in any film, TV show, or novel I have ever experienced. It is very thick, & the guy sinks so slowly that he does not even realize he is sinking until it is up to his knees.
his pursuers come with boards strapped to their feet, and dig him out. They talk about those who had not been rescued, who supposedly had drowned, and whose possessions were there for the taking by anyone willing to dig for them.
I suppose the thickness depends on the volume of water entering the mass of sand, but other than this one film, every depiction of QS was like applesauce, it was so thin.
 
Yeah, I wanted a scene like this in my latest WiP but the smallest amount of research showed how unlikely it was to be effective in real life. Where quicksand kills it tends to be because -- like the Morecombe Bay sands -- people can't move fast enough when the tide rushes in, so they're not killed by being swallowed by the sands, they drown in the water.

Having said that, people do die in things like grain silos, where they sink into the grain and can't get free -- no water there, of course, and the grain size is thicker than most sand grains I imagine.

As to film depictions, there is a death by quicksand in the film-within-the-film of The Artist, and, of course, there's the lightning sand in The Princess Bride -- neither very realistic. And in novels, it features in a Peter Wimsey story, but off the top of my head I can't remember which one.
 
The "lightning sand" also appeared in the third Mad Max film. They had a book in my grade school library about making QS, but the experiment wasn't successful to our satisfaction since we were looking to submerge a Star Wars figure in it.
Eddie Izzard met a gruesome QS fate in the 2004 film Blueberry (known as Renegade in the US.)
To me, the Tar Pit is a far deadlier trap than QS. The fossil finds in actual tar pits depict a grim scenario of animals becoming mired in it, dying slow deaths while attracting predators that also become stuck and also die slow, miserable deaths.
 
Isn't tar much lower in density than either water or sand? Or is it typically a mixture of tar & sand? Anyway, in Jonny Quest, that old guy in the wheelchair vainly trying to rescue his pterodactyl for the tar pit, would himself, be gone rather quick, no pun intended.
 
Not sure about the density comparison or Johnny Quest. I was thinking more of the real life tar pits (an example being - La Brea Tar Pits - Wikipedia )
I guess that bothers me more than QS because rather than drowning the animals in tar pits are usually subjected to slow, agonizing deaths. They create quite a fossil record for us to study, though.
 
ALMOST forgot! a reminder to anyone interested, WOMAN IN THE DUNES will be on TCM 3:45 PM (EST) this Friday, 03/03/2017. It has much slower quicksand than any other film I know. Perhaps, it was the real stuff!
 
Back when I was Mini MT, I was briefly obsessed with a film called When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth. I haven't seen it since the age of about eight, so I can't remember if it was good or not, but one of the main characters in that died from QS. She went running after the rest of the main cast, landed on a patch of QS and was gone in about a second.
 
I have that on DVD! :ROFLMAO: Made by HAMMER FILMS, as I recall. Girl 'hatched' from dinosaur egg!

HAMMER FILMS version of HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES also had some very quick QS, or was it something else?
 
They had spoken to a geologist about grades of sand most likely found in QS, etc., but I think they used too high a volume of water injected, as it was very thin. There was a History Channel program about a year ago that also included homemade QS. These guys' QS was so thick, that they simply could not pull their guy out of it.
I agree about the buoyancy factor, but in addition, I think "Quicksand" itself may be a misnomer.

Sand, as in grains of quartz (SiO2) (mineral sands are old beach sands that contain concentrations of other minerals, rutile, ilmenite, zircon and monazite) would not pull or suck you down. They are very hard and tiring to move through though, which is why they are used in Escape Lane car traps on steep hills.

As a child, I also had a fear of ever being caught in QS after watching the films you describe. However, looking back on those films now, what they were really using looks more like "Quickmud"!

Mud or silt particles are mostly Clay minerals (hydrous aluminium phyllosilicates, which form in the presence of water) mixed with organic matter. These are much more "sticky." If you try to walk in river mud or pond mud, you are far more likely to have trouble lifting your foot out, and may often lose a shoe or wellie. Mud may not pull you in, as those films showed, but it is often hard to climb out of.
 
I agree about the buoyancy factor, but in addition, I think "Quicksand" itself may be a misnomer.

Sand, as in grains of quartz (SiO2) (mineral sands are old beach sands that contain concentrations of other minerals, rutile, ilmenite, zircon and monazite) would not pull or suck you down. They are very hard and tiring to move through though, which is why they are used in Escape Lane car traps on steep hills.

As a child, I also had a fear of ever being caught in QS after watching the films you describe. However, looking back on those films now, what they were really using looks more like "Quickmud"!

Mud or silt particles are mostly Clay minerals (hydrous aluminium phyllosilicates, which form in the presence of water) mixed with organic matter. These are much more "sticky." If you try to walk in river mud or pond mud, you are far more likely to have trouble lifting your foot out, and may often lose a shoe or wellie. Mud may not pull you in, as those films showed, but it is often hard to climb out of.
When I was a kid, we had THE ANSWER BOOK or some other such thing. It explained QS along with many other things. QS, as explained by the book, formed when an underground stream emptied into an area of sand or other granulated substance, and acted as lubricant between the grains. When a panic-stricken person falls into it, he will naturally attempt to escape as fast as possible. But, as the thickness of the QS keeps it from rapidly flowing into the void left when a leg or person is rapidly pulled upward, the void is a vacuum, and acts to suck the victim downward. I do not recall any mention of buoyancy, but I was just a kid. So, as I recall, that force and gravity together act against buoyancy, and the victim goes under.

:eek:

However, Buoyancy might be negated or at least lessened by heavy boots, and other things, lack of normal body fat, etc.
 
Oh, sorry I forgot this part, in regards to QUICK MUD or QS, the MYTH BUSTERS in their coverage of KILLER QUICKSAND, consulted a geologist regarding the type of sand most likely to be QS. I think it was all about the grain size, though there could have been more to it.
 
I have just checked New Arabian Nights, and the QS in that novel is called Graden Floe. For me, this suggests QS formed by the tide, as was the case with the Morecombe Bay sands, at least my understanding of them.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top