Matteo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,383
A perverse part of me was tempted to leave this thread with just the title. But I suppose I should put down my thoughts first and let others weigh in. Elsewhere, on the What are you reading thread, I've mentioned some brief comments over time, but my latest foray into the mind of GM has persuaded me to start a separate thread.
I first read his work in the early 90's when I picked up almost his entire run of Doom Patrol for about 20p a copy - it was a shop advertising in Comics International and his name was not even mentioned; just the title which intrigued me and I thought for that price worth a punt. I thought it was strange, crazy and fun. A few years ago I filled in the few gaps and now I have the omnibus.
A few years later my local comic dealer recommended The Invisibles. Again, he didn't say "by Grant Morrison!!" but simply that he thought it was good. I started buying the issues every month and it was (is) good. Very good. And unlike anything I'd read before. A bit more structured than Doom Patrol and more "adult" and some strange concepts and, toward the end especially, occasionally coming close to stepping over the line separating weird and "huh?", but superb. Over the years it received repeated readings and I now own the omnibus.
Of course, since then (more or less) his reputation has grown and his name is mentioned in the same breathe as Gaiman and Moore. In an effort to see whether this reputation is deserved I have bought other graphic novels and collections which I list below with some brief comments:
- Animal Man: good stories, great character development, but leave the fourth wall alone...
- The Filth: stepped over that line...(see "what are reading")
- We3: wonderful story
- All Star Superman: excellent and thoughtful
- New X-Men: great fun, a bit mad, but fun
- his Batman run: very good, restrained but not too restrained
- The Flash: nothing special, could be anyone writing
- Seven Soldiers: another fun one, obviously he liked the source material
- Joe the Barbarian: clever
- Superman-Action Comics: trying to be too clever resulting in a mess
- Nameless: bizarre, nasty, a bit confusing, but ultimately good
It boggles my mind that the person who wrote All Star Superman and The Filth are the same person. I assume that on certain, well-established, titles his excesses are controlled by "the powers that be" because when he lets go he can really let go. Unfortunately, that letting go can degenerate into a mess (e.g. The Filth and Action Comics - for different reasons).
My feeling is that he is at his best when he is given some freedom but with someone telling him "err...no Grant you can't say that, or that, and certainly not that and he can't do that", because the guy can write, he really can. He comes up with interesting ideas, crazy concepts and thoughtful situations and characters. Unfortunately he often disappears up his own you know what.
Anyway, that's enough from me. Discuss.
I first read his work in the early 90's when I picked up almost his entire run of Doom Patrol for about 20p a copy - it was a shop advertising in Comics International and his name was not even mentioned; just the title which intrigued me and I thought for that price worth a punt. I thought it was strange, crazy and fun. A few years ago I filled in the few gaps and now I have the omnibus.
A few years later my local comic dealer recommended The Invisibles. Again, he didn't say "by Grant Morrison!!" but simply that he thought it was good. I started buying the issues every month and it was (is) good. Very good. And unlike anything I'd read before. A bit more structured than Doom Patrol and more "adult" and some strange concepts and, toward the end especially, occasionally coming close to stepping over the line separating weird and "huh?", but superb. Over the years it received repeated readings and I now own the omnibus.
Of course, since then (more or less) his reputation has grown and his name is mentioned in the same breathe as Gaiman and Moore. In an effort to see whether this reputation is deserved I have bought other graphic novels and collections which I list below with some brief comments:
- Animal Man: good stories, great character development, but leave the fourth wall alone...
- The Filth: stepped over that line...(see "what are reading")
- We3: wonderful story
- All Star Superman: excellent and thoughtful
- New X-Men: great fun, a bit mad, but fun
- his Batman run: very good, restrained but not too restrained
- The Flash: nothing special, could be anyone writing
- Seven Soldiers: another fun one, obviously he liked the source material
- Joe the Barbarian: clever
- Superman-Action Comics: trying to be too clever resulting in a mess
- Nameless: bizarre, nasty, a bit confusing, but ultimately good
It boggles my mind that the person who wrote All Star Superman and The Filth are the same person. I assume that on certain, well-established, titles his excesses are controlled by "the powers that be" because when he lets go he can really let go. Unfortunately, that letting go can degenerate into a mess (e.g. The Filth and Action Comics - for different reasons).
My feeling is that he is at his best when he is given some freedom but with someone telling him "err...no Grant you can't say that, or that, and certainly not that and he can't do that", because the guy can write, he really can. He comes up with interesting ideas, crazy concepts and thoughtful situations and characters. Unfortunately he often disappears up his own you know what.
Anyway, that's enough from me. Discuss.