Emphyricist
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2017
- Messages
- 47
In another thread I compared Jack Vance to Gilbert and Sullivan (and Archer) because both combine high culture and low humor, write manic, topsy-turvy plots, and there isn't really anything quite like either.
However I think that there might be at least as much of an analogy with Warren Zevon (not coincidentally my favorite musician), insomuch as both have a cynical yet sympathetic view of human nature and share a fondness for obscure references, dark humor, and irony. Vance's stories combine a fatalistic belief that people are terrible with an optimistic, upbeat endings. Warren Zevon's songs often combine fatalism and humor, as with "Roland The Headless Thompson Gunner," "The French Inhaler," or the entire album Life'll Kill Ya.
Gilbert and Sullivan, when I think about it, might be closer to Robert Sheckley or Terry Pratchett: found of creating worlds which are absurd even on the face of things yet employ the humor of recognition. Though all three also take a jaded view of human nature, it's more absurdist than cynical, and there's not nearly the same degree of underlying darkness.
On one hand, it might seem absurd to compare SF&F writers to writers of music. On the other hand, I think that the reason I like all five are rather similar: they reflect a view of human nature which I share, though probably leaning more towards the fatalist optimism of Vance and Zevon.
However I think that there might be at least as much of an analogy with Warren Zevon (not coincidentally my favorite musician), insomuch as both have a cynical yet sympathetic view of human nature and share a fondness for obscure references, dark humor, and irony. Vance's stories combine a fatalistic belief that people are terrible with an optimistic, upbeat endings. Warren Zevon's songs often combine fatalism and humor, as with "Roland The Headless Thompson Gunner," "The French Inhaler," or the entire album Life'll Kill Ya.
Gilbert and Sullivan, when I think about it, might be closer to Robert Sheckley or Terry Pratchett: found of creating worlds which are absurd even on the face of things yet employ the humor of recognition. Though all three also take a jaded view of human nature, it's more absurdist than cynical, and there's not nearly the same degree of underlying darkness.
On one hand, it might seem absurd to compare SF&F writers to writers of music. On the other hand, I think that the reason I like all five are rather similar: they reflect a view of human nature which I share, though probably leaning more towards the fatalist optimism of Vance and Zevon.