Claim: Humans recorded asteroid strike that caused mini-ice age

Brian G Turner

Fantasist & Futurist
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
26,686
Location
UK
Ancient carvings show comet hit Earth and triggered mini ice age

Ancient symbols carved into stone at an archaeological site in Turkey tell the story of a devastating comet impact that triggered a mini ice age more than 13,000 years ago.

Evidence from the carvings, made on a pillar known as the Vulture Stone, suggests that a swarm of comet fragments hit the Earth in around 11000 BC.
...

The site is at Gobekli Tepe in southern Turkey, which experts now believe may have been an ancient observatory.

I thought the city was dated as beginning in the 10th millennium BC, and this observation puts it as earlier. I don't remember any suggestion of Gobekli Tepe using stone before this time, so I find myself having to approach this story with some respect but a little more scepticism.
 
So, no comment on the comet?
(Not arguing with your stance -- this is, to be sure, only supported by fragmentary evidence.)
 
It's possible, but still hard to believe after all this time. We all look at Earth as we can it right now and we tend to forget that the continents moved around and changed its surface a lot. Scientists said Mediterranean See will dissapear and Australia will hit the continent again in the future.

It seems small asteroids pass within this distance of Earth a few times a week. Wednesday, one of them named 2014 JO25, came about 1.1 million miles (1.8 million kilometers) from Earth, NASA says. I read another article telling it passed safetely away, but that one was in French, so I cannot give you the link.

130214132407-asteroid-near-miss-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg


NASA captures images of large asteroid set to fly by Earth - CNN.com
 
It's possible, but still hard to believe after all this time. We all look at Earth as we can it right now and we tend to forget that the continents moved around and changed its surface a lot. Scientists said Mediterranean See will dissapear and Australia will hit the continent again in the future.

It seems small asteroids pass within this distance of Earth a few times a week. Wednesday, one of them named 2014 JO25, came about 1.1 million miles (1.8 million kilometers) from Earth, NASA says. I read another article telling it passed safetely away, but that one was in French, so I cannot give you the link.

130214132407-asteroid-near-miss-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg


NASA captures images of large asteroid set to fly by Earth - CNN.com
Such changes, seeable only in the imagination's long view, are one of the most fascinating subjects I've ever run across!
(I wonder if there's a Velikovsky thread...?)
 
You mean about the colliding of the continents ? We had a series of documentary on TV. I really enjoyed watching them.

Imagine that. 250 millions ago, we had only a continent, Pangaea and a huge ocean, Panthalassa. 50 millions later, a big land mass split and 7 continents and several oceans were born. Quite impressive, isn't it ?
 
this is like a chicken and the egg question, left or right well you could also bring in the God element if you so wished but the element which I reline my own documentary on is the facts for the researchers, scientist and scholars. acknowledgement they`ll so richly given there are other basic fact like the ice age, dinosaurs plus the facts by Alexa shows some impressive facts. but they`ll always be more questions of when, where and how!
 
You mean about the colliding of the continents ? We had a series of documentary on TV. I really enjoyed watching them.

Imagine that. 250 millions ago, we had only a continent, Pangaea and a huge ocean, Panthalassa. 50 millions later, a big land mass split and 7 continents and several oceans were born. Quite impressive, isn't it ?
What fascinates me is how people who speak about evolution often seem to miss the possibility that evolution itself might have been shaped/altered by movements, even joinders, of the continents...

Sorry, Brian, I think we've wandered off point...but if it's any consolation, we're having fun!
 
this is like a chicken and the egg question, left or right well you could also bring in the God element if you so wished but the element which I reline my own documentary on is the facts for the researchers, scientist and scholars. acknowledgement they`ll so richly given there are other basic fact like the ice age, dinosaurs plus the facts by Alexa shows some impressive facts. but they`ll always be more questions of when, where and how!
I think of it, during dream time, as the Earth breathing -- the continents draw together as if the planet is expelling breath...then they separate as the planet takes another deep breath, causing its chest to expand...
 
I think of it, during dream time, as the Earth breathing -- the continents draw together as if the planet is expelling breath...then they separate as the planet takes another deep breath, causing its chest to expand...
I totally agree with your statement this subject is multi-complex to call it in one smaller pieces to explain all the elements drawing together the whole system. argh! getting deeper in than I`m able to do today. 2DaveWixon I hope we`ll be able to chat some more later on this.
 
I totally agree with your statement this subject is multi-complex to call it in one smaller pieces to explain all the elements drawing together the whole system. argh! getting deeper in than I`m able to do today. 2DaveWixon I hope we`ll be able to chat some more later on this.
Me for some deep-breathing exercises!
 
What fascinates me is how people who speak about evolution often seem to miss the possibility that evolution itself might have been shaped/altered by movements, even joinders, of the continents...
Geographical barriers isolating populations are one important mechanism leading to the creation of different species. The re-introduction of invasive species creates competition for resources and produces natural selection. However, continental drift is very slow and I think droughts or floods causing the appearance and disappearance of land bridges, or volcanic activity, or faults following earthquakes would be more common means.

Regarding the original post, I'm not qualified to make an opinion on the scientific validity, but history is all about telling good stories. Those pictures are just another way of telling history. There are "flood event" stories in every culture but the date is flexible. The date of this "broken comet event" could also be flexible. The "good story" would be much more important than the historical accuracy.
 
Geographical barriers isolating populations are one important mechanism leading to the creation of different species. The re-introduction of invasive species creates competition for resources and produces natural selection. However, continental drift is very slow and I think droughts or floods causing the appearance and disappearance of land bridges, or volcanic activity, or faults following earthquakes would be more common means.

Regarding the original post, I'm not qualified to make an opinion on the scientific validity, but history is all about telling good stories. Those pictures are just another way of telling history. There are "flood event" stories in every culture but the date is flexible. The date of this "broken comet event" could also be flexible. The "good story" would be much more important than the historical accuracy.
True that!
Nonetheless, while I'm no sort of expert on Turkey, I do seem to recall with interest the number of interesting archaeological finds in the last few decades -- town in caves, buried cities, fields of stones with mysterious carvings...
It certainly makes sense that Asia Minor (does anyone ever use that name any more?) would be a natural crossroads for migrations, both human and non-... I think if I were in college and thinking about archaeology, I'd look into taking Turkish lessons.
(it's not so long ago that Turkish arch. was all about Troy...)
 
I think I'll be kind and say that the article is simply bad science fiction...


...unless it took the reporters from the New Scientist and the Press Association 20 days to write the article....
 
All right. I found another article about the same subject, but much more interesting and professional. Brian, let us know if you are still skeptical.

Using a computer programme to show where the constellations would have appeared above Turkey thousands of years ago, they were able to pinpoint the comet strike to 10,950BC, the exact time the Younger Dryas begins according to ice core data from Greenland.

The Younger Dryas is viewed as a crucial period for humanity, as it roughly coincides with the emergence of agriculture and the first Neolithic civilisations.

ss-composite-image-2017-4-21-10-50-large_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqqVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8.png


"It appears Göbekli Tepe was, among other things, an observatory for monitoring the night sky.

“One of its pillars seems to have served as a memorial to this devastating event – probably the worst day in history since the end of the ice age.”

Gobekli Tepe, is thought to be the world's oldest temple site, which dates from around 9,000BC, predating Stonehenge by around 6,000 years.

Ancient stone carvings confirm how comet struck Earth in 10,950BC, sparking the rise of civilisations
 
Gobekli Tepe, is thought to be the world's oldest temple site, which dates from around 9,000BC

This is what I mean - the dates are all wrong. The press keep reporting that a temple - not started until 9,000BC - happens to accurately record an asteroid strike that happened 2,000 years before it was even built.
 
This is what I mean - the dates are all wrong. The press keep reporting that a temple - not started until 9,000BC - happens to accurately record an asteroid strike that happened 2,000 years before it was even built.
Brian has a point. Passing down folk stories between generations by word of mouth is one thing. Remembering accurately, the exact positions in the night sky, of stars for 2000 years, before recording them carved on stone is another.

Unless, it was accurately transcribed from an earlier stone in an earlier temple.
 
This piece continues to bother me, so I dug deeper - the original research paper can be found here:
http://maajournal.com/Issues/2017/Vol17-1/Sweatman and Tsikritsis 17(1).pdf

What it basically says is that someone looked to see if they could get images of animals on a specific stone to match constellations using a piece of software. They did get a fit, but only for 4 specific dates:

2,000 AD – Winter solstice
4,350 BC – Autumnal equinox
10,950 BC – Summer solstice
18,000 BC – Spring equinox

They then checked to see whether any related to dating of the stone.

But here's the strange part - someone previously radiocarbon dated the stone to around 11,000 BC. But the last I heard, stone cannot be radiocarbon-dated because ... it's stone. You can only do this with organic matter, because that contains the carbon matter for dating.

So the researcher decided on the 10,950 BC date to match the radiocarbon dating - even though this means the structure would pre-date the settlement by 2,000 years.

In fact, the research paper itself mentions almost nothing about the actual archaeology or dating on the site.

But the researcher has heard of the comet theory for wiping out the mammoths, so immediately connected both dates. That's what the paper states.

The rest of the stone markings remain unexplained, but there is a circle - which is now presumed to be the comet to fit this date.

Which now becomes a "fragmented asteroid" that wiped out the mammoths. The irony being, the Telegraph article in an earlier post points out that the theory that a comet wiped out the mammoths is no longer accepted.

IMO this study is based on flawed assumptions from start to finish, resulting in a grand statement that just isn't supported by the actual evidence.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top