Was this graffiti person grammatically correct?

Danny McG

Lid closed, monkey dead.
Joined
Sep 9, 2016
Messages
8,039
Location
Cumbria UK
FB_IMG_1495828120023.jpg
 
When it mentions reducing money worries and then advises us to pick up a leaflet, I'm reminded of the currency reform introduced by the Golgafrinchans on arriving on Earth.

I suppose the leaflet would be equivalent to a penny or a cent, with the leaf being more like a pound, dollar or Euro.
 
The question should be, is grammar necessary in advertising?

My thoughts are that it is not. The message overrides everything else, although I do concede the terrible example above does not support my view.
 
Fairy Nuff.
I don't mind if some ads were planned to be spelled wrong or poorly worded.
I've never felt an urge to correct Beanz Meanz Heinz :)
 
I would be happy with it uncorrected.

If life had just as many worries as today, but they were all trivial (ie less) we would all be much happier.
 
Although that might actually make them lesser worries, rather than less worries.

Incidentally (Very incidentally), according to wikipedia, James the Less had a brother called Jo (or Joses), and Zebedee was the father of James the Great. (Not the greater??!)
She springs up everywhere, that woman. It's all an advertising gimmick, set up 2000 odd years before she even wrote the books.
 
It isn't even a very good selling technique. People who take leaflets home rarely read them, let alone act upon them. They need to be getting people to hand over their bank details and sign on the dotted line right here now. :)
 

Similar threads


Back
Top