- Joined
- Dec 2, 2015
- Messages
- 873
Read Susan Cooper's Over Sea, Under Stone
You're going to love it!Finished The Dark Forest and on to the third volume of the trilogy, Death's End. Very good stuff.
The War of the Flowers by Tad Williams. It's strange to read Williams' descriptions of the real world. I like his writing style, but I hope it doesn't get bogged down the way that chunks of Memory, Sorrow and Thorn did.
Apparently, because Newman had successful movies the titles of which started with an H (Hud, The Hustler) the producers changed the name of the character from Archer to Harper.
Randy M.
Finished In the Ocean of Night. Good premise, some parts nicely done, but other parts slow and awkward. I understand it's a 'fix-up' and this shows. When Benford sticks to the hard SF he's fine, but when he spends dozens of pages on the protagonists wierd relationship for no purpose, it's much less good. The end is also a little weak I think. Benford ends the book with what I call 'method writing' instead of just clear story telling, in which he resorts to a style of implication rather than exposition that I don't get on well with. This would be a great SF book if it was half the length, retaining only the necessary scenes and cutting out all the stuff on Bigfoot. I probably won't read further in the series. That said, it's not awful and Benford is not a bad writer I think.I'll be interested in how you get on with that series. I loved the first, liked the next three, but found the last two became just too weird for me to wrap my poor little head around.
Pretty similar to myself, though, possibly I liked it a bit more. I did like the hard SF aspects. However the books that follow on from this are radically different and, in my opinion, much poorer, particularly the last couple. So I wouldn't disagree with your decision!Finished In the Ocean of Night. Good premise, some parts nicely done, but other parts slow and awkward. I understand it's a 'fix-up' and this shows. When Benford sticks to the hard SF he's fine, but when he spends dozens of pages on the protagonists wierd relationship for no purpose, it's much less good. The end is also a little weak I think. Benford ends the book with what I call 'method writing' instead of just clear story telling, in which he resorts to a style of implication rather than exposition that I don't get on well with. This would be a great SF book if it was half the length, retaining only the necessary scenes and cutting out all the stuff on Bigfoot. I probably won't read further in the series. That said, it's not awful and Benford is not a bad writer I think.