And not for the better.
What I mean is when you ask Amazon to display "top" reviews for a book or product. Until recently, what would happen is that you'd get the reviews with the greatest number of "helpful" votes (also taking into account the number of "not-helpful" votes, I think, but not a straightforward net of them). These reviews tended to be the longest, best-written and most amusing.
Now you get something like this:
Amazon.co.uk:Customer reviews: Snobs: A Novel
None of the "top" eight reviews have any "helpful" votes at all. They are all one line. The supposedly 4th most helpful review out of 77 is, in its entirety, "gave as a gift".
I note, however, they are all recent, and all verified purchases. So is this how Amazon is weighting "helpfulness" now? It makes finding genuinely useful reviews time-consuming and haphazard.
One star, Amazon.
What I mean is when you ask Amazon to display "top" reviews for a book or product. Until recently, what would happen is that you'd get the reviews with the greatest number of "helpful" votes (also taking into account the number of "not-helpful" votes, I think, but not a straightforward net of them). These reviews tended to be the longest, best-written and most amusing.
Now you get something like this:
Amazon.co.uk:Customer reviews: Snobs: A Novel
None of the "top" eight reviews have any "helpful" votes at all. They are all one line. The supposedly 4th most helpful review out of 77 is, in its entirety, "gave as a gift".
I note, however, they are all recent, and all verified purchases. So is this how Amazon is weighting "helpfulness" now? It makes finding genuinely useful reviews time-consuming and haphazard.
One star, Amazon.