So we get to talk about the stories in this thread?
Yep, talk away (but not so as to explain your own story as that has to stand on its own two feet without your further help). We'd like a lot more discussion of the stories themselves, but most of us have got lazy and we leave it to the few reviewers to do all the heavy lifting.
Here's the relevant rule if you are thinking of commenting:
Reviews/Critiques
We welcome short reviews of the stories entered in the Challenges since these add to the general enjoyment of the contests. There is no obligation on anyone to write such reviews, but if you are thinking of doing so, please bear two issues in mind:
- Reviews should include every story submitted regardless of whether you like a particular story or even understand it. If you merely want to comment on a handful of entries that most appeal to you, especially when setting out a shortlist before voting, that is of course acceptable, but for anything more than that, it’s Review One, Review All.
- Reviews should be short, and positive in tone and content.
Please note we do not allow any element of critique or criticism of the stories in the Discussion threads, which were instituted to allow members to highlight stories they especially liked, and that remains their overriding rationale. The Challenges are meant to be enjoyable and open to all, regardless of writing prowess; lengthy critiques and critical remarks are liable to damage both objectives.
The "Review One, Review All" rule was introduced to avoid a situation where someone reviewed a number of stories, missed out one, then reviewed several more, then missed another one or two, and so on, which could well cause distress for the members whose stories were omitted. (If someone is reviewing them all, but then can't continue for some reason, that's another matter, of course -- it's the picking and choosing we want to avoid.)