Onyx
Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2018
- Messages
- 1,004
I love SF and even like to write some of things I find "unrealistic", so bear with me:
Colonizing terraformed planets. The more I think about this, the less likely it seems. In stories, people build ships, travel frozen or in uncomfortable generational conditions all to get to a planet that isn't going to be earth like so they can turn it into a place to build houses and farm? Here on earth, people who grow up on farms seem to want to migrate to cities. Why would the people of the future want to be land owners on an empty panet when they could have made less of an effort to construct an artificial environment in a moon or on a more secure space station that has all the advantages of cities and no concerns about environmental disasters. Planets with atmospheres are more difficult to travel to and from as well as travel between points.
How much room do we need? Currently, half the world's population lives on 1% of the available land, and the earth is only 29% land. That means that 3.7 billion people are currently living in the equivalent of a single rotating cylinder that is 800 miles long and 250 in diameter. Which would certainly be somewhat crowded, but no more so than most large cities. You could have a quarter of that density and still fit 1 billion people. So creating surface area to live comfortably doesn't really require that much engineering, which is why the math is unlikely to ever make turning some boiling ball of CO2 into a replacement earth ever very attractive. It might become interesting as a kind of stunt or piece of nostalgia, but not really as a useful way to deal with population expansion or even people who get that old-timey settler itch. Find an asteroid to settle in, if that's your thing.
Colonizing terraformed planets. The more I think about this, the less likely it seems. In stories, people build ships, travel frozen or in uncomfortable generational conditions all to get to a planet that isn't going to be earth like so they can turn it into a place to build houses and farm? Here on earth, people who grow up on farms seem to want to migrate to cities. Why would the people of the future want to be land owners on an empty panet when they could have made less of an effort to construct an artificial environment in a moon or on a more secure space station that has all the advantages of cities and no concerns about environmental disasters. Planets with atmospheres are more difficult to travel to and from as well as travel between points.
How much room do we need? Currently, half the world's population lives on 1% of the available land, and the earth is only 29% land. That means that 3.7 billion people are currently living in the equivalent of a single rotating cylinder that is 800 miles long and 250 in diameter. Which would certainly be somewhat crowded, but no more so than most large cities. You could have a quarter of that density and still fit 1 billion people. So creating surface area to live comfortably doesn't really require that much engineering, which is why the math is unlikely to ever make turning some boiling ball of CO2 into a replacement earth ever very attractive. It might become interesting as a kind of stunt or piece of nostalgia, but not really as a useful way to deal with population expansion or even people who get that old-timey settler itch. Find an asteroid to settle in, if that's your thing.