What I meant was that the 90's Batman films were atrocious and something had to be done. Batman Begins therefore was necessary.
And I think calling them atrocious is an insult to the word atrocious. Making it far worse is the fact that a children's cartoon of Batman was FAR better than any of the movies. Better dialogue, better acting, better characterization... even the movies based on the cartoon (
Mask of the Phantasm, anyone?) were far better, so it can't be blamed on the format. I will never forget seeing
Heart of Ice (the episode that introduced Mr. Freeze) and being utterly blown away by how sympathetic the villain was and how Batman, by simply doing what he does, contributed to his tragedy. The movies, in contrast, were the tragedy themselves.
Why reboot Batman? His origins aren’t what you would call unknown, why not just make a film with a new story instead of retreading old paths? Or are the words new and story together along with new and ideas an anathema to Hollywood?
While I agree that Hollywood is horrible at coming up with new material, I have to admit that Batman did need the reboot after the really horrible movies. But, you have a really good point that Hollywood is not particularly known for new storylines and characters, preferring endless sequels and reboots over actually working at a story. Honestly, it is probably a money thing more than anything else. Disney, for example, knows the same population will turn out for every MCU story put out, and it will make them gobs of cash. Why the reboot of
Pirates, though? My best guess would be to gender swap the protagonist, which would broaden the appeal to the female 25-54 demographic, Disney's core market. Be ready for Captain Jacqueline (who goes by Jack) Sparrow.