Eli Grey
Well-Known Member
I'm watching King Kong (1933) for the first time after having seen the dreadful Kong: Skull Island and the magnificent King Kong (2005), the latter I've seen nearly a dozen times. However, Peter Jackson's King Kong has been ridiculed for the less than impressive split screen with the dinosaurs. The original also had split screen in its dinosaur scene. Did Peter Jackson intentionally make the split screen with the dinosaurs as unconvincing as he did as an homage to the scene in the original? Probably not, but the rest of the film looked great, so why hold out on that one scene?