LukeLee
Member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2019
- Messages
- 19
I know there are a lot of posts on this and I’ve read a lot of them, but I guess in sci-fi it’s a very difficult line to walk.
I’m writing sci-fi for the first time, my other books were contemporary and historical, and I’m following an old school route of taking a horse-opera (of my own - albeit not a western) and turning it into a space-opera. In a way.
I’m still working through the first draft but I have two issues wrt info-dumping that I would appreciate your thoughts on. I will contribute to this thread myself of course as I rewrite and rewrite (and rewrite and rewrite and....), so I’m not just being lazy or taking shortcuts. I have realised in my lurking of this forum that there are some incredible contributors who are very talented.
So, to the issues.
1. Species - My MC is not human but seems so. I don’t describe other humans except to point out a specific feature that my MC notices or comments on (I am writing in FP for this one). But for other species, I need to give the reader enough to understand what they are and how they behave. A feel for them, but in the shortest amount of words possible. They need to picture them. Other authors I’ve read describe the thing they are most like that the reader will identify with - hamsters, lizards etc. Of the occasions I’ve encountered this it works well for me, but it feels lazy for me to do personally. Am I making things too difficult for myself? How do you guys handle this? I think in some cases, I can handle with a show but not all. Maybe I just handle them all differently depending on the story at that point.
2. Backstory - In my original book, and in this one, the first few chapters are about an interaction between the protagonist and an antagonist. The interaction sets up the story to an extent (I’m not looking for critique at this stage but will later), but the trigger point is when the antagonist prompts the MC to self-analysis (in the original story this prompted a flashback but that wouldn’t work in the WiP). Again, I’m in FP so in WiP it is an internal dialogue where the MC justifies himself against the antagonist’s assumptions of who and what he is. The only thing is, it feels like an info-dump. On the other hand, it is the trigger point of the story - MC thinks about who he is and who everyone else thinks he is and then over the rest of the story realises he was wrong on all counts. In a nutshell. I’m not sure I can do this effectively without the info-dump. Looking back at my original story, I may rewrite that one day with whatever I decide to do with this one.
Anyhoo, I’m going to continue as is and when I finish the first draft come back to it and see how it handles. I usually read my first draft in its entireity without editing to see how it hangs together and that might be the point that I find it fits, or it is needed elsewhere or if the backstory is unnecessary for the reader after all.
I think this is a challenge for any sci-fi writer, hence the post, and I’d appreciate the wisdom of the hive.
I’m writing sci-fi for the first time, my other books were contemporary and historical, and I’m following an old school route of taking a horse-opera (of my own - albeit not a western) and turning it into a space-opera. In a way.
I’m still working through the first draft but I have two issues wrt info-dumping that I would appreciate your thoughts on. I will contribute to this thread myself of course as I rewrite and rewrite (and rewrite and rewrite and....), so I’m not just being lazy or taking shortcuts. I have realised in my lurking of this forum that there are some incredible contributors who are very talented.
So, to the issues.
1. Species - My MC is not human but seems so. I don’t describe other humans except to point out a specific feature that my MC notices or comments on (I am writing in FP for this one). But for other species, I need to give the reader enough to understand what they are and how they behave. A feel for them, but in the shortest amount of words possible. They need to picture them. Other authors I’ve read describe the thing they are most like that the reader will identify with - hamsters, lizards etc. Of the occasions I’ve encountered this it works well for me, but it feels lazy for me to do personally. Am I making things too difficult for myself? How do you guys handle this? I think in some cases, I can handle with a show but not all. Maybe I just handle them all differently depending on the story at that point.
2. Backstory - In my original book, and in this one, the first few chapters are about an interaction between the protagonist and an antagonist. The interaction sets up the story to an extent (I’m not looking for critique at this stage but will later), but the trigger point is when the antagonist prompts the MC to self-analysis (in the original story this prompted a flashback but that wouldn’t work in the WiP). Again, I’m in FP so in WiP it is an internal dialogue where the MC justifies himself against the antagonist’s assumptions of who and what he is. The only thing is, it feels like an info-dump. On the other hand, it is the trigger point of the story - MC thinks about who he is and who everyone else thinks he is and then over the rest of the story realises he was wrong on all counts. In a nutshell. I’m not sure I can do this effectively without the info-dump. Looking back at my original story, I may rewrite that one day with whatever I decide to do with this one.
Anyhoo, I’m going to continue as is and when I finish the first draft come back to it and see how it handles. I usually read my first draft in its entireity without editing to see how it hangs together and that might be the point that I find it fits, or it is needed elsewhere or if the backstory is unnecessary for the reader after all.
I think this is a challenge for any sci-fi writer, hence the post, and I’d appreciate the wisdom of the hive.