What To Consider Before You Hire An Editor

Toby Frost

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
8,072
Definitely recommend "try before you buy" - send short samples out and see whether their feedback works for you. And just because an editor has a big reputation doesn't mean to say they'll be good for you. Also, get an idea of price before-hand, and don't presume high fees means high-standard of work.
 
Definitely recommend "try before you buy" - send short samples out and see whether their feedback works for you. And just because an editor has a big reputation doesn't mean to say they'll be good for you. Also, get an idea of price before-hand, and don't presume high fees means high-standard of work.

Indeed. I sent out a sample to an editor who came highly recommended (not a Chronner!) for my crime novel. When I received the sample back, she had been very thorough with her editing, but so much so that she'd pretty much rewritten the first 1,000 words in entirely her own style. She said, very magnanimously, that she'd be prepared to take me on as a client, but I declined. There wasn't a single positive comment, not even a hint of one, in her entire edit. Not one of the edits were for grammar/spelling/style as such, but she changed pretty much everything else. I have no objection to being torn apart, but the prospect of 90k words of negativity just blew my confidence in myself completely.

After her sample edit, I failed to write anything at all for several months. I completely lost my creativity until a certain Ms Zebedee took me to task over a coffee and made me think through why I'd lost it. We worked out between us that this editor had been the cause. I have since discovered that a) she's really picky about who she takes on (I'm really not flattered) and b) she has alienated many, many of my writing friends over the past few years with her acid tongue.

Now, I consider myself to have a fairly thick skin when it comes to critique, but I discovered that I have limits! When @Teresa Edgerton edited a fantasy manuscript for me*, it was a totally different experience. She tore it apart with the greatest kindness, found plenty of positive to keep me inspired, and was in fact the best mentor/editor/friend I could possibly have had. Such a difference. I can't recommend Teresa highly enough.

Definitely send a sample before committing, and then think carefully about whether that editor's style suits you and your writing before you sign on the dotted line.

*Sorry, Teresa. That MS is still sitting partially edited. Since my Mum died, and I became sole carer for my father (91 with dementia), my writing slots have decreased to 20-30 minutes at a time most days. However, I have applied for an Arts Council grant to enable me to employ carers and pay for a couple of weekend retreats so I can have a concentrated effort to knock that story into shape. Then, I plan to submit it everywhere (carefully and in a controlled manner! ;))
 
I'm impressed you can even write at all while acting as sole carer for an aged and ailing parent, Kerry. As I know (from caring for my own mother in her last months, by spending most of the summer caring for a friend) the work can be exhausting, not just physically, but mentally and emotionally. If you are writing at all, I'm impressed. (And not just because you said nice things about me.)

I hope you get the grant and are able to get help caring for your father, and can take those weekend retreats!
 
This is what happened to me; early on in the process.
Indeed. I sent out a sample to an editor who came highly recommended (not a Chronner!) for my crime novel. When I received the sample back, she had been very thorough with her editing, but so much so that she'd pretty much rewritten the first 1,000 words in entirely her own style. She said, very magnanimously, that she'd be prepared to take me on as a client, but I declined. There wasn't a single positive comment, not even a hint of one, in her entire edit. Not one of the edits were for grammar/spelling/style as such, but she changed pretty much everything else. I have no objection to being torn apart, but the prospect of 90k words of negativity just blew my confidence in myself completely.
However it did highlight that I just wasn't really as ready to go to the editor as I thoughts. I fortunately had my significant other to help me through about ten edits before submitting it to the next potential editor. Any editor offering that many changes and claiming to be willing to work with you is either nuts or charging an arm and a leg for all their time.

That really begins to sound like a ghost-writer anyway.


As for the article I particularly agree with the order of editing with copy editing at the end.
Too many times I've found things in Self Published works that look to have been major changes that took place in some other editing phase that create problems that should have been discovered with one final copy edit.
 
Last edited:
There is a lot in the article. The first thing that confuses me is the physical layout of the text itself. It gives me the appearance of going in and out of focus. I find it harder to read when the look gets too artistic. Comes out like one should know all this stuff and it's just written as a reminder to jog one's memory.

Not knowing what a story bible was, I thought it was a glossary. Looking it up, I see it's an outline of the whole story with explanations. I always thought glossaries were useful but after reading that article I am wondering if glossaries can't also ruin the surprise of the story for some readers. Would it be better to print the glossary upside down so it wouldn't accidentally ruin the story for some readers. Put a spoiler warning, printed upside down to prevent unintentional reading. Then I got to wondering if the glossary is an info dump. Another reason to leave it out. Or is a glossary an acceptable info dump, safely located at the back of the book.

What I couldn't find an answer for, and maybe it's there and I missed it, but does it matter if the editor doesn't see science fiction as anything but fantasized fiction through and through. Should an editor for science fiction think that science fiction can be more than just another fictional story.

In terms of the story line, when I tried several "indie" editors, I came away with the distinct impression that the elephant and the blind men were still very much alive.
 

Back
Top