Hyphen tragedy

For the record, I object.
So do I.

It's almost as if those changing the style guide don't realise that the function of grammar is to make the meaning of text as clear as possible. (Well, as clear as the writer requires** it to be.)

But I suppose that if one takes the name of the rules one expects to be applied -- style guide -- at face value, one has already taken the first step down the slippery slope to incomprehensibility: clarity is not the aim; adherence to the latest fashion is. :(


By the way, if we were to follow AP down this rabbit hole, it would make it harder to keep within the word limit of the challenges... so I'm confident that most of those taking part in the challenges will be against adopting this nonsense of a change....


** - Writers are allowed to deliberately obscure what they mean: deliberate ambiguity is a useful tool in the writer's toolbox.
 
I read that article, and I wouldn't pay much mind to it. It's for AP writer, which means reporters, and we all know they aren't a definitive source for good grammar. That's rather like asking a doctor for penmanship lessons ;)

More specifically this appears to be aimed at sports reporters, who are even worse at practicing good writing. From the sounds of that article, this came about because they couldn't agree on whether to use "first-quarter-touchdown", or "first-quarter touchdown" or "first quarter-touchdown" or just without hyphens. These are the same guys that us such marvelous expressions as "x of y" indicating "x" successes in "y" attempts.

I would ignore them anyway.
 
More specifically this appears to be aimed at sports reporters, who are even worse at practicing good writing.

Perhaps, but at least they're snappy dressers ;)

zT2H1.jpg


K2
 
That's Grapes - Don Cherry, for any non-hockey-aware people... and we've had a different suit from him every week for decades.
 
From the sounds of that article, this came about because they couldn't agree on whether to use "first-quarter-touchdown", or "first-quarter touchdown" or "first quarter-touchdown" or just without hyphens.

Luckily, the new hyphen doesn't change the old math. Winning athletes will still need to give "a hundred and ten percent".
 
>More specifically this appears to be aimed at sports reporters, who are even worse at practicing good writing.
I object! Some of our best sports writers (not TV announcers; different critter) have written some of the best short work of the 20thc. I can't speak to 21stc as I've rather stopped paying attention.
Here's an example, often cited. https://www.bloodhorse.com/pdf/DeathofaRacehorse_Heinz.pdf
 
@sknox, I would submit that the “best” sport writers like many “best” book authors rarely observe all of the rules of a style guide. ;)
 
True enough. I would add, though, that for the student writer--and we are all of us students of the craft--knowing the best writers sometimes break the rules is less valuable than learning when they do observe the rules. Which is just another way of saying "study the masters."
 

Similar threads


Back
Top