I don't know enough about the specifics here to be sure, but if this follows the normal kind of merger aftermath it follows this pattern. Acquire a business sell off the least profitable businesses or the businesses with the least up side to reduce your debt and increase the profit margin. It is capitalism pure and simple --- well maybe not so pure. Usually the people who get hurt are the little guys. I'm always reminded of case of the sewing pattern manufacturer, Simplicity Patterns. For a number of years the company employed a work force numbering a few hundred and paid them well. The company was profitable, but they owned some other things property as well. A venture capitalist firm bought them out. Sold the business piecemeal and made a tidy profit (tens of millions IRC). But now the company which owned the pattern business found that the profits of that business were too small, cut the work force, and eventually moved the work out of the USA. Everyone did well, but the common people.
I hope I'm wrong, but I don't expect anything good to come of this.