DLCroix
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
- Messages
- 339
Hi! I did a quick check on the threads and I don't seem to have detected anything similar. In any case, I would like to clarify that this only corresponds to the format in which I usually work my texts and that is why I want to comment on it for someone can use it.
I am aware that those who have been writing for several years do not need to change their formula. Rather I do it thinking of the youngest, those who perhaps wonder how others do it. (I didn't say something too silly, did I?)
At least me when I started this I felt the same curiosity, so I thought it would be good to share it.
Since I'm a designer, I initially wrote the stories in QuarkXPress layouts. Then I started doing it in InDesign. This allowed me to visualize the text on facing and numbered pages as hypothetically they would look in a book. But over time I found that the files were too heavy. Also, it was not the most common file type that is usually handled. In fact, later you had to convert them to doc or rtf. So I started to think that in the end maybe it would be better to work from the beginning in Word.
Which is the program I currently use. I tried others like Writer 6 and the like for a while, but I still like Word.
Regarding the format, after examining several pocket books, I determined a page size of 13 x 20 cm. With a margin of 1.27 cm top, bottom, left and right. Or Narrow, as it appears in the panel preferences.
The body of the text: Times New Roman, 10.
Display scale: 178%.
Paragraph: Justified. First line indentation: 0.5 cm. Line spacing: 12 or exact.
The advantages of this format, as I see it, are two:
The first, that you can also work on facing pages so that on a scale of 120% you can get an idea of how the text would look once printed. It also allows you to print it that way, so it's the closest you can get to knowing what it will look like.
And BTW you save paper. The trees will thank you!
The second advantage is that it allows you to divide the screen in 2. In this way, on the left-hand side you can have a video play or watch a photo that inspires you.
Anyway. I hope this helps those who are curious to know what work methods others have.
I am aware that those who have been writing for several years do not need to change their formula. Rather I do it thinking of the youngest, those who perhaps wonder how others do it. (I didn't say something too silly, did I?)
At least me when I started this I felt the same curiosity, so I thought it would be good to share it.
Since I'm a designer, I initially wrote the stories in QuarkXPress layouts. Then I started doing it in InDesign. This allowed me to visualize the text on facing and numbered pages as hypothetically they would look in a book. But over time I found that the files were too heavy. Also, it was not the most common file type that is usually handled. In fact, later you had to convert them to doc or rtf. So I started to think that in the end maybe it would be better to work from the beginning in Word.
Which is the program I currently use. I tried others like Writer 6 and the like for a while, but I still like Word.
Regarding the format, after examining several pocket books, I determined a page size of 13 x 20 cm. With a margin of 1.27 cm top, bottom, left and right. Or Narrow, as it appears in the panel preferences.
The body of the text: Times New Roman, 10.
Display scale: 178%.
Paragraph: Justified. First line indentation: 0.5 cm. Line spacing: 12 or exact.
The advantages of this format, as I see it, are two:
The first, that you can also work on facing pages so that on a scale of 120% you can get an idea of how the text would look once printed. It also allows you to print it that way, so it's the closest you can get to knowing what it will look like.
And BTW you save paper. The trees will thank you!
The second advantage is that it allows you to divide the screen in 2. In this way, on the left-hand side you can have a video play or watch a photo that inspires you.
Anyway. I hope this helps those who are curious to know what work methods others have.