And could it be that even Sauron was not really the Lord of the Ring but mere another servant the Ring ? Which do you think was really master , the Sauron or the Ring?
The Ring was Sauron. Which is why until it was destroyed he never could be. Certainly whilst alive he had total control, but when his body was killed, the only physical part that remained was the ring. With no physical form he was utterly dependant on the Ring to cling on to some form of existence.
In a way he became a slave to it, because he was ever watching out for it, and if he had concentrated on conquering Middle-earth with his forces rather than worrying where the Ring was or who might use it, he may have won.
Sauron's biggest error was making that ring in first place.
Sauron's greatest fear was that the other races of Middle-earth would join forces to defeat him. So by the gifting of the rings he ensured that he would control his most powerful potential adversaries and also be able to undo anything they wrought. And it worked beautifully for him; even if he was defeated, he would always be able to return as long as the One Ring wasn't destroyed, something that he simply couldn't envisage happening.
I think that if he hadn't created the Ring he would eventually have been overwhelmed by his enemies. I think his biggest error was not guarding the one thing that could defeat him; the Cracks of Doom.
Or even sealing off the entrancesStationing a large orc army near Cracks might have done the trick .
Or even sealing off the entrances
To be fair, to actually get to them you had to breach substantial defences already in place. And if it hadn't been for Aragorn at the gates and the orcs of Cirith Ungol killing themselves over Frodo's mithrail shirt, the hobbits would never have got anywhere near Mount Doom. Even so, you still make absolutely sure by (as Baylor says) stationing an army of orcs there (or maybe a Nazgul) or building a fortress over them.
But it seems that Sauron and his forces weren't much in the way of builders of citadels or fortresses, as most (all?) of those they occupied were built by men or elves in ages past.
Sauron (and Morgoth before him) were rarely creators, but corruptors of what had been created.
I also think that at some point on dark lord defence, you've got to say "good enough" and "I don't have enough resources for more".
Plus he saw no reason why Mount Doom would need to be defended anyway.
Interesting thought. I would think that Sauron was the master given that he was the creator and put his own power into the ring. But who knows what the ring might have developed into over time?
Yes, Minas Morgul, Cirith Ungol and the Towers of the Teeth, Carchost and Narchost, were built by the rulers of Gondor, to keep an eye on Mordor. But Barad-dûr itself was built by Sauron himself, using the power of the Ring.But it seems that Sauron and his forces weren't much in the way of builders of citadels or fortresses, as most (all?) of those they occupied were built by men or elves in ages past.
It seems odd to think that the elves - knowing that (almost) everything they had built was held ransom by the One Ring - didn't abandon this and rebuild without the influence of their rings to do so. They surely knew that they were on borrowed time, and being almost immortal , they would likely still be around when the Ring was eventually discovered and either returned to Sauron or destroyed. Men and dwarves , having lost their rings much earlier, probably benefitted in that most of what they built was without the power of the rings, and so were protected in the long term.
Gandalf tells Frodo in 'The Shadow of the Past' that 3 of the dwarf rings were recovered and 4 consumed by dragons. (I always liked to think that Smaug consumed one, which was reason for his great longevity, power and intelligence). The 7 given to men turned their owners into wraiths and servants of Sauron, but the 3 given to elves were not recovered, but that 'all that has been wrought with them will be laid bare'. Galadriel tells Frodo that 'Lothlorien will fade' if the One Ring is destroyed, and I would assume could probably be said of Rivendell.
It just surprises me somewhat that knowing the evil influence of the One Ring (and to a lesser extent the 3 elven rings), that the elves would have still used - and indeed continued to use - them. They should have attempted to destroy them, or at least stop using them. Presumably previous to Sauron gifting the rings, the elves had been powerful, influential people. Why could they not just go back to the way they had been before they had been given the 3?
Men and dwarves were lucky in that the temptation had been forcibly taken away from them. They had had no choice but to get on with life without the use of powerful magical rings, so all that they built was not dependant on the recovery or destruction of the One Ring.