Starlink cannot offer a service superior to anything currently in existence, it is far more expensive than other internet options and is unaffordable by most of the planet,
It depends where you live. Starlink isn't intended for people who have access to cable internet, but people with poor internet infrastructure, low speeds or dial up internet, or are nomadic, or want to bypass regional censorship. It has a use case. Speeds over 100mbps are higher than speeds from any local cable providers in my area, so even from that perspective it's better. I imagine it has a relatively small, but wealthy customer base for whom the cost is nothing.
and it enormously increases the chances of a Kessler Syndrome event - satellite collisions creating debris that causes other collisions in a cascading crescendo that destroys everything in orbit and makes future launches into orbit impossible (the movie Gravity gives nice visuals of this event).
Space above our planet is huge. There are currently 3,000 satellites (out of 8,000 total man made objects) orbiting earth, above 196,900,000 square miles of earth's surface (more if you take into account height). That's one satellite per 65,633 square miles (roughly the size of Oklahoma) - assuming they're travelling at the same height - which is unlikely. The biggest satellite, GOES-R is roughly the size of a pickup truck. The chances of collision are extremely remote at present.
Chris Hadfield is very critical of Gravity:
Anyone here with additional/updated data on the problems of Starlink?
The same channel also looks at Starship and Musk's plans to colonise Mars. It summarises nicely what I already thought of Musk's projects. My own feeling is that he will eventually crash and crash hard.
He most likely will, going to Mars will take incredible engineering and co-operation with space agencies internationally - but at least he's doing
something and driving the technology forward. I don't even think going to Mars is that good an idea. Venus seems a better destination for exploration, imho.
His commissioning of work on reusable rockets, the raptor engine and falcon heavy have revolutionised space travel. Those are enormous successes that, whilst not attributable to him directly, simply would not have existed at this moment in time without his drive and vision.
People say Musk is a fraud because he doesn't invent anything personally or receives investment from the Government. They view him as a con man or a flim flam artist, but Musk's skill is his ability to mobilise people and capital in service of ground breaking technologies and to promote adoption amongst consumers.