Metazoa by Peter Godfrey-Smith

Stephen Palmer

author of books
Supporter
Joined
Dec 22, 2009
Messages
6,534
Location
Shropshire
This terrific book is nothing less than a history of the likely evolution of the animal mind, starting from nothing, or, at least, from a past so distant there are almost no fossils. Published last year, it has already won many plaudits.

It begins with the simplest known multicellular animal types, focussing on glass sponges. In this and subsequent fascinating chapters, the author develops a theory of the animal mind using sensing and movement as his core processes. The chapters then go on to self-sensing, the crucial importance of knowing whether a stimulus comes from self or from the world outside, and then a look at how ever more sophisticated mental models evolved – and why.

Brilliantly written, compelling and fascinating, this is an excellent book. The author also has a go at analysing the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness, qualia. He is a materialist monist, so in my view he comes to a highly plausible declaration, which is that the mind is not something created by the brain, it is the brain, that is, when the brain is doing all its usual things. The mind in other words is not a thing or a consequence, it is a process. This leads to an excellent demolition of the usual SF AI tropes of mind-uploading, etc, which I had a go at in my novels Beautiful Intelligence and No Grave For A Fox (reviewers had differing opinions of the results).

This book comes highly recommended from me for non-specialist and specialists readers alike. The author’s first book on octopi, Other Minds, has been acknowledged a classic. I’ll be seeking out a copy soon.

Chronners who remember @Vertigo and myself raving about Nick Lane's superb The Vital Question will want to check this out.
9780008321239.jpg
 
. He is a materialist monist, so in my view he comes to a highly plausible declaration, which is that the mind is not something created by the brain, it is the brain, that is, when the brain is doing all its usual things. The mind in other words is not a thing or a consequence, it is a process. View attachment 85837
I seem to recall seeing this book before. Looks interesting. I have this book; given to me by my father. And another one packed away somewhere about biology, similar to this one.
5ED4FA4D-0E70-4423-A416-EB391C5BF8DD.jpeg


As for the segment I clipped, I often wonder what gives our minds a unique identity. I always think, “why am I me?” What makes a person conscious of their own existence? A brain, I guess, is a kind of functioning mechanism that is independent of other vital organs… it’s interesting to think about how each of these organs operates on their own, as if they have an existence of their own… but then, why am I not aware of them?
 
My first answer (as ever!) is to check out Nicholas Humphrey's YouTube channel and head for The Inner Eye.
As for your specific point, you are aware of organs in your body, just not consciously. If we were aware of everything going on we'd be so overwhelmed with irrelevant information we'd cease to function. This in essence is one of the reasons we have a huge unconscious and a comparatively small and selective conscious.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top