What might dinosaurs be called if they were alive like anything else that's alive today?

Bramandin

Bramandin

Science fiction fantasy
Joined
May 5, 2022
Messages
576
1657599120407.png


I don't know, but it might be fun to include carnivorous turkeys in a fantasy setting.

Also, how does one elegantly include them in a book? Sure when I mentioned people eating smoked pig I didn't need to go into how they're vicious wild terrors unless they're going to be attacked by one. Also, if an author calls horses "runner-beasts" they're likely to get something more like a rhinoceros. RENEGADES OF PERN | The Art of Michael Whelan
 
Maybe I'm overthinking this. Maybe I should try to find a video of someone playing "chubby bunnies" in a foreign language and type out what I think I hear.
 
Coincidentally I'm reading Brian Aldiss' The Malacia Tapestry, which features Ancestral Animals, or as we know them, Dinosaurs, with some interesting names: Trundles; Devil-jaws; Slobbergobs; Side-rowels, Tyrant-greaves; Grab-skeeters; Yatterhobs: Snaphances; and several others.
Then there are the great ancestrals of the deep: Fanglefish; Crazies; Speckled Sabre-snouts; Goddies; and others.
Or the flying Frizzen-bats and Leather-tooths

en.wikipedia.org

The Malacia Tapestry - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

A little more info found here
"Malacia's extensive farmlands and estates are the homes of the "Ancestral Animals", basically Late Cretaceous period dinosaurs, such as Triceratops, Ornithomimus, Allosaurus and small Pterosaurs."
 
If dinosaurs were just generally around and unremarkable, I reckon they'd have names no odder (or less odd) than "regular" animals like ferrets and wombats. "Dad, there's a cudger scaring the greep in the south field!" Though some that were known to the ancient Greeks and Romans in this scenario might end up with the same names as in our world, like "triceratops".
 
Fiberglass Cyborg said:
If dinosaurs were just generally around and unremarkable, I reckon they'd have names no odder (or less odd) than "regular" animals like ferrets and wombats. "Dad, there's a cudger scaring the greep in the south field!" Though some that were known to the ancient Greeks and Romans in this scenario might end up with the same names as in our world, like "triceratops".
Click to expand...
That's pretty much what I was thinking. Though the more dangerous ones might have shorter names. Jarb for something that might eat people where Thandari might be something where you just have to not spook it.
 
I understand that chickens are about the closest things that we now have for dinosaurs. Only smaller dinosaurs could have continued to exist in a human dominated world, and even then only those that could be domesticated.
 
paranoid marvin said:
I understand that chickens are about the closest things that we now have for dinosaurs. Only smaller dinosaurs could have continued to exist in a human dominated world, and even then only those that could be domesticated.
Click to expand...

We have wild turkeys and foxes, but yeah we probably would have exterminated everything that was a threat to us. Except for emu; that's some nuts stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Brian G Turner Earth might have had a ring system 466 million years ago Science & Nature 15
M New research on the involvement of immune system problems in ageing and how it might be fixed - works in mice.... Science & Nature 2
HareBrain Honey badgers: not as sweet as they might sound Science & Nature 11
M Wetland Scrapes - might even be able to have one in a garden (my thought) Science & Nature 0
C One Lake might best represent the Anthropocene Science & Nature 20

Similar threads


Back
Top