ctg
weaver of the unseen
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Messages
- 9,829
Rhaenyra oversteps at the Small Council. Viserys is urged to secure the succession through marriage. Daemon announces his intentions.
IMDB score: 8.9/10 Runtime: ~50 min
Rhaenyra oversteps at the Small Council. Viserys is urged to secure the succession through marriage. Daemon announces his intentions.
Absolutely! What were they thinking?I also like that the series has a new intro with the classical GoT music. It is part of the hook that draws so many into these stories
Given its title, it should come as no surprise that HBO’s new Game of Thrones prequel, House of the Dragon, is going to have a lot of goddamn dragons. Seventeen, in fact. All owned, flown, and maintained by House Targaryen, and each with their own personality quirks, character design, and George R.R. Martin-created name.
In the 11 years since Thrones first hit HBO, CGI technology has advanced by leaps and bounds, and House of the Dragon was able to give life to its beasts like never before. WIRED talked to Ryan Condal and Miguel Sapochnik, the series’ showrunners, about what’s new this time around.
This conversation contains spoilers and has been edited for clarity and length.
There are a lot of dragons in the new show, and a poorly realized dragon can really take you out of a scene. How did you realize these very non-real creatures?
Sapochnik: Everything’s a work in progress because you keep working on it until they take it away from you. A lot of what makes it feel real is usually the last 5 percent of the work that you do, which is often the most time-consuming and most expensive.
With our dragons, you can get the animation, the things that they touch, and how they interact with the real objects, like the ground they stepped on and left footprints. Those kinds of things, you can get that right. You can hide problems with smoke and atmosphere and stuff like that. But what you want are details that you wouldn’t otherwise notice and would in any normal situation be considered a luxury that you don’t have time for.
For example, there are flies on the dragons. That’s what we’ve been focusing on because these are smelly, big creatures, and smelly, big creatures usually attract flies. By having flies, and seeing those little darting shapes that are going around the dragons, it gives you a sense that there’s something more real about this dragon than meets the eye. That’s really what we’ve been trying to do, like, how can we get details that will become more than the sum of their parts? How can we effectively find a way to make these things feel real?
Ryan, do these new dragons have more distinct characteristics? Are they more pet-like? How are they different?
Ryan Condal: I think we tried to imbue them all with a distinct sense of personality and place within the story, because dragons are a fact of life in this world. They’ve existed for centuries. They’re different ages and sizes and shapes and silhouettes and colors. It was really important to George [R.R. Martin] that we did that, because he envisioned his dragons being very colorful, like bearded dragons and the very colorful lizards that you can see in our biosphere.
The biggest dragon is so big that her horns have started to fall off. She looks old, and she has evidence of former saddles on her because people had to re-saddle her as she grew and grew. Some of the old saddles, they just put a new saddle on top of the old.
Other dragons are young and juvenile and still learning the world. They’re more curious, like the velociraptors in Jurassic Park. Daemon’s dragon is very cantankerous and twitchy and never stops moving, kind of like his rider.
So I think certainly with the dragons that we spend the most time with, we tried to imbue personalities into them that either match the riders or are set in opposition to their riders. In the end, hopefully, our dragons will be as recognizable as human characters in the show. You’ll be able to identify them from a distance based on their color or their silhouette. When you have a bunch of them in the same scene together, you want to very quickly be able to say, “That’s Caraxes, that’s Vhagar, and that’s Seasmoke.”
The title sequence for House of the Dragon depicts the Targaryen family tree, starting with the doom of Valyria and Aegon the Conqueror. As the opening progresses, a deep red liquid flows between symbols that represent subsequent members of the Targaryen family. Since the Targaryen words are “Fire and Blood,” and so much of the series is focused on the importance of legacy, bloodlines, succession, and family ties, it’s not surprising that the opening shows literal blood flowing through its artwork. It also foreshadows the bloody civil war that will eventually lead to the downfall of the Targaryen dynasty.
I strongly feel that the show is moving towards, as I hinted about the Young Queen in my piece. It's just I really don't know if it's going to happen, or if there is a twist, because there always those in George's plays. It feels more that we are driving towards a civil war, because the Cruel Prince cannot handle being demoted from the Throne and Corly's that he cannot be the Deal Maker.What's it going to take for Viserys to realize that Rhaenyra, despite her age and gender, has him strategically outgunned? Her courage and analytical ability would better serve the realm than his experience and caution. He can maintain the patriarchal illusion while taking her counsel seriously behind the scenes.
I thought dragon possession was the key to Targaryen control of the Iron Thone. How is it crab-feeding pirates feel they can attack any part of the Seven Kingdoms with impunity?The dragonriders are something that we haven't seen, but we know now that there's a whole fleet of them. Ready to burn crispy any opposers
Because they know something and that freedom allows them to behave badly.How is it crab-feeding pirates feel they can attack any part of the Seven Kingdoms with impunity?
I wondered if the dragons would have thrown flames at each other or just barbecued the humans.I know the dragon would have won the whole thing, but if he was taken out from the equation...
Probably both, and there would've been a lot of hissing, snarling and tail whipping. It's just we've never seen them slashing angrily with their tails.I wondered if the dragons would have thrown flames at each other or just barbecued the humans.
I agree. I had to watch another episode, but I wasn't sure at all about all the being given to the first episode. This had none of the "Gore" and "Sex" but it did have a story I could get a hold on. It did have "Dragon" action, and these Dragons are going to be important!A much better episode.
I didn't understand why Dragon-riders couldn't be sent as Rhae suggested? Is it because they are female, and in this misogynistic world that is a taboo? Obviously, this attitude is a long-arc theme which it going to be reversed by the series end. {edit: Apparently not as Viserys himself is a dragonrider.)I thought dragon possession was the key to Targaryen control of the Iron Thone. How is it crab-feeding pirates feel they can attack any part of the Seven Kingdoms with impunity?
I still don't like any, but I can at least sympathise with Princess Rhae. She is swimming in a sea of fools.There are no nice characters here and there will be none in the future.
Hmm! In real life, that scene wouldn't happen. The applicants were vetted first by the Hand, so why introduce a choice that he wasn't happy with? Rhae would have instead been presented with five choices that were all very similar, and any of them would have been acceptable to him."The men are tourney champions," Rhae reasoned. "My father should be defended by someone with real combat experience. Should he not?"
The Hand didn't argue. How could he have? Ser Criston wasn't his choice.
I agree, but for some reason they hadn't thought about Dragons or that they would actually have to fight. For some reason, they thought he would simply come to his senses, give back the egg, and say sorry. If Rhae hadn't turned up then it would have been a bloodbath. I expect the Dragon would have just sat and watched.I just noticed it, but why is that none of the men at the Dragonstone's narrow bridge carried pikes or polearms? They were all armed with swords, while if they'd have clashed, pikeman would have been a winner. My understanding is that the long sword would be a bit useless in the close quarters match that the clash between the Hand and Cruel Prince's forces, or am I wrong?
I know the dragon would have won the whole thing, but if he was taken out from the equation.
Is it him, or is there something that we don't know about going on? I suspect some people in the Small Council are playing him, and his play back was to marry to Hightower. I don't think he even knows whose behind things.King Viserys is portrayed as particularly dim. He is constantly behind the curve. He walks into problems. He is set up. He upsets his allies and angers his enemies. How could he still be there?