It does! Colour me excited.
I was twelve when I saw Raiders in the cinema. It was an experience that can’t be replicated today.
Hmmm. The CGI looks distracting in places. Hopefully they can 'dial' down the over-the-top action and weird humour and just give us a good, solid mystery adventure with some decent character work. Indy deserves a better send-off than Crystal Skull.
I was twelve when I saw Raiders in the cinema. It was an experience that can’t be replicated today.
This, and the Dungeons and Dragons movie are two films I definitely want to see .
Strewth.I was forty when I saw Crystal Skull at the cinema. That was an experience which I hope won't ever be replicated again.
It does! Colour me excited.
He says in Raiders that he doesn't believe in mumbo-jumbo, but apparently saw an enormous amount of it in India a few years prior.I think Lucas is right that the problem with it is that the treasure quest never has the pizazz of the original. These flying monsters melt you because you looked inside the box of the one true God who is very sensitive.
It's hard to top that.
I love that idea, @Swank. Not enough film makers are bold enough to try different scenarios. But they should have faith that it's almost always the characters audiences come back for, not the action beats. The classic example is Empire Strikes Back. Apart from the Hoth battle at the beginning, there's hardly any action in the movie at all. It's just characters following their own arcs against the backdrop of a broader struggle. And its commonly accepted to still be the best Star Wars movie of all time.He says in Raiders that he doesn't believe in mumbo-jumbo, but apparently saw an enormous amount of it in India a few years prior.
Some films should not have sequels - no matter how tempting. The best thing they could have done was something wholly different with the character, rather than another treasure seeking adventure. Have Indy get stuck in a country going through a revolution. Have him agree to negotiate/rescue someone kidnapped in Bolivia. Show a very different aspect of his history.
John Rhys-Davies brings some fire to it.
I am not won over by the title but it could be worse.
Why can't Disney get rid of that damn piano tinkle for once?
Every trailer is designed the same way--they have the quiet voice over and then the piano tinkling sadly...and then a synthesizer-enhanced version of a score.
I heard about Raiders--I knew all about it but didn't see it-partly because it was very crowded summer and our local theater didn't keep movies for long so we would have to wait if it ever came back. And Raiders took a while to come there--maybe 6 months-- and I was in a car, in my pajamas when we learned it was showing so I went in and watched it in the theater in my pajamas.
I saw Temple of Doom on opening day--cut school for it and when I got to class the next day, the art class teacher did roll call and when he got to my name he paused, put his hands on the lectern and said calmly, "how was it?"
When I saw Last Crusade I had a total media blackout--I ignored all information so the treasure would be a secret but on the opening day--I met some kid I knew from school and he unfortunately confirmed what it was.
I think Lucas is right that the problem with it is that the treasure quest never has the pizazz of the original. These flying monsters melt you because you looked inside the box of the one true God who is very sensitive.
It's hard to top that.
I agree that Empire was a real departure.I love that idea, @Swank. Not enough film makers are bold enough to try different scenarios. But they should have faith that it's almost always the characters audiences come back for, not the action beats. The classic example is Empire Strikes Back. Apart from the Hoth battle at the beginning, there's hardly any action in the movie at all. It's just characters following their own arcs against the backdrop of a broader struggle. And its commonly accepted to still be the best Star Wars movie of all time.