A few interesting ancient languages brought to life on YouTube:
As far as I'm aware French comes from Latin, like Italian, Spanish and Portuguese.
Have a look at the Indo-European language Tree
Yes, I know French is derived from Latin, but the French accent is unique and doesn't fit with the other Romance languages.French grammar is Latin in origin as is most of its vocabulary as far as I know (I speak French albeit a bit rusty now).
E.g.:
j'aime - amo - I love
tu aime - (te) amas - you (sing.) love
il/elle aime - (ille/illa) amat - he/she loves
nous aimons - (nos) amamus - we love
vous aimez - (vos) amatis - you (pl.) love
ils aiment - (illi) amant - they love
Mmmmh....I don't think the Franks had much effect on the accent of the Gallo-Romans anywhere except in northern Gaul since that's where they originally lived and they didn't migrate southwards. That's Wiki's take: "The Franks expanded south into Gaul. Although the Franks would eventually conquer almost all of Gaul, speakers of Old Franconian expanded only into northern Gaul in numbers sufficient to have a linguistic effect. For several centuries, northern Gaul was a bilingual territory (Vulgar Latin and Franconian)." Old French did pick up several hundred words from Frankish like jardin (garden), but it seems they had about as much influence on the development of French as Norse had on English, at least in central and southern France. The Franks became Gallo-Romans with modifications, not the other way round.Yes, I know French is derived from Latin, but the French accent is unique and doesn't fit with the other Romance languages.
However, I think I got it wrong - it won't be the Goths the French accent came from, but the Franks of course!
They didn't need to - standardized French is based on Parisian French, is it not?I don't think the Franks had much effect on the accent of the Gallo-Romans anywhere except in northern Gaul since that's where they originally lived and they didn't migrate southwards.
Norse had a huge effect on English. Apparently, if standardized English had been based on its use in old Danelaw areas in the north of England, ie, York, rather than somewhere central and Saxon like Birmingham, then English would have had far more Norse words and would have sounded more Germanic.it seems they had about as much influence on the development of French as Norse had on English
I'm not sure what standardised French is based on - it might possibly be made up rather like standardised English (or Oxford English) that doesn't reflect how most people actually talk.They didn't need to - standardized French is based on Parisian French, is it not?
Also:
Norse had a huge effect on English. Apparently, if standardized English had been based on its use in old Danelaw areas in the north of England, ie, York, rather than somewhere central and Saxon like Birmingham, then English would have had far more Norse words and would have sounded more Germanic.