At present, relatively few countries have actually made human cloning illegal, and if the necessary work is undertaken on an alien ship using alien technology, especially if actually by an alien who doesn't come down to Earth, then the question of legal jurisdiction is rather moot.
Most countries, though, do have laws about dead bodies, and what must happen when one is found, so anyone deemed to have interfered with a corpse -- and presumably a crime scene -- would be subject to penalties, though again an alien remaining on board the alien ship is likely to evade prosecution.
Most legislation is aimed at whoever has undertaken the illegal conduct, but there's a possibility that in some anti-cloning legislation there are provisions for the destruction of whatever is produced. In that case, the person created here might be in danger, depending on the wording eg "and any resulting blastocyst/embryo shall be destroyed" would only apply to those creations, excluding a person, while "and any creation resulting shall be destroyed" would include a person. Having said that, if the person who is made is only partly human and mostly inorganic, there's a chance that any anti-cloning legislation might well not apply anyway. A field day for lawyers, in fact.
In any event, regardless of legal implications the new person will be feared and therefore likely to come under attack, both metaphorically (ie in the press/social media and via hastily-drafted legislation wherever she lives) and literally by way of physical violence, unless she has a very powerful protector -- her own strength against would-be assailants would only increase the fear and hate generated against her, not diminish it in any way, so would be counterproductive.
Anyway, this sounds like a question for Writing Discussion, so I'll move it over there.