H. Rider Haggard "The Days of My Life" - his autobiography
Over 400 pages long. I skimmed some of the last 100 pages, as they tended to be about his current political interests. Otherwise I found it a really interesting read. I hadn't realized how much of an action man he'd been. Before becoming a writer he'd been deeply involved, a player even, in the Zulu and Boer wars. After his initial success as a writer, he made a point of travelling, often to remote places in significant hardship, to research the landscapes of his novels. In later life he took an active role in trying to better the conditions of the working man, particularly those working on the land. In this autobiography he also muses at some length on his own writing process. He was also poor academically at school, though, it seems, he was good with his fists...
A couple of points of interest for me:
His three most well known novels - King Solomon's Mines, She, Allan Quatermain were written in a space of about eighteen months, while also working as a barrister, organising work on a large farm, and coping with the responsibilities of a young family. It seems to me that some people, Roger Zelazny for instance, produce their best work while under significant pressure.
I was very interested that in the late nineteenth century there was strong opposition to smallpox vaccination, comparable in its virulence to current opposition to Covid inoculation . Please note: this is not intended to stimulate debate on the rights and wrongs of vaccination just that I find the parallel interesting.
In 1898 Haggard published a book "Dr Therne" in which a smallpox epidemic sweeps the UK. The general theme was that smallpox vaccination was essential. (Haggard had seen on his travels at first hand the horrors of smallpox).
The Lancet wrote: we must commend Mr Haggard's courage in thus entering the lists against the Anti-Vaccination party. As a novelist and a politician alike it is evidently to his advantage to take no step that would be likely to alienate him from any large body of possible supporters. Yet he has risked losing many readers and creating a fanatical opposition to whatever he may do in a public or private capacity for the sake of telling the truth.