Swank
and debonair
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2022
- Messages
- 2,353
I find myself in a minority among SF fans on this site - I like heavy, sometimes hard-to-parse, high concept SF. Which is decidedly not "hard SF", a concept that has been taken over by the belief that certain types of speculation are "real" and some are not. Examples of people I think of as serious would be Gibson, Watts, Herbert, Stevenson, Banks, Vernor Vinge, Maddox, Liu Cixin, Marusek, Robinson, Robert Reed, Vandermeer and Reynolds (on a good book).
Stuff I have enjoyed that isn't so serious would be Connie Willis, Martha 'Murderbot' Wells, Scalzi, The Expanse. But it's all a little fluffy. Much like classics - Niven, Pohl, Heinlein, etc.
I tried the rather serious Too Like the Lightning, and couldn't get into it. It didn't appear to be going anywhere quickly - or not be about a serious enough topic. Yesterday I picked up SubOrbital 7 because Gibson wrote a blurb for it - it was like soggy Tom Clancy.
I just keep re-reading the same books because trying to read new stuff is so disappointing. And then I just don't read - or switch to some other genre.
Anyone else like this kinda thing? Suggestions?
Stuff I have enjoyed that isn't so serious would be Connie Willis, Martha 'Murderbot' Wells, Scalzi, The Expanse. But it's all a little fluffy. Much like classics - Niven, Pohl, Heinlein, etc.
I tried the rather serious Too Like the Lightning, and couldn't get into it. It didn't appear to be going anywhere quickly - or not be about a serious enough topic. Yesterday I picked up SubOrbital 7 because Gibson wrote a blurb for it - it was like soggy Tom Clancy.
I just keep re-reading the same books because trying to read new stuff is so disappointing. And then I just don't read - or switch to some other genre.
Anyone else like this kinda thing? Suggestions?