I bought both Gardens and Deadhouse, and I know everyone is saying that Gardens of the Moon is the worst one in the series, but after reading it, I realy dont have any will to read the next one.
In my mind Erikson is in no way better than D&D books, everywhere unrealisticaly powerful people, magic is absurdly strong. Characters are very numerous but also very lifeless. They get a name and couple of character developing lines and thats it. That all is really everything I dont like in fantasy. I know this sound like I hated the book, but I quite liked the story, its got complex background and overall it was a decent fantasy. But decent fantasy is pletiful and most of them are much less time consuming.
Most important is that I realy like strong living characters and for the ones in Eriksons book I didnt care a thing.
So my question, does it get drastically better?
In my mind Erikson is in no way better than D&D books, everywhere unrealisticaly powerful people, magic is absurdly strong. Characters are very numerous but also very lifeless. They get a name and couple of character developing lines and thats it. That all is really everything I dont like in fantasy. I know this sound like I hated the book, but I quite liked the story, its got complex background and overall it was a decent fantasy. But decent fantasy is pletiful and most of them are much less time consuming.
Most important is that I realy like strong living characters and for the ones in Eriksons book I didnt care a thing.
So my question, does it get drastically better?
Last edited: