I've just finished reading this book and I leave it feeling conflicted. I was recommended it by a man in a book shop after a brief chat about Michael Marshall (Smith) and Jeff Noon, both writers that I enjoy greatly. Perhaps I was expecting something different to this.
At times it seemed hugely implausible (Kephri etc, but isn't that what 'suspension of disbelief is all about' I hear you say... you'd be right
) and
overly descriptive. There are great swathes of prose that I skipped past near the end that I feel were unnecessary (
spoiler(?): when they're laying the cable I don't feel that he needed to explain
EVERY inch put down!). In that respect it reminded me very much of Neil Stephenson towards the end of his Baroque Cycle (which I just couldn't bring myself to finish! A first as I
always finish a book! I was just too bored, what can I say? I've got a good attention span, but not that good!).
On the other hand, I can also say that I couldn't put it down! The characters were well developed and I felt considerable empathy towards them - when Lin disappeared from the plot I actually became increasingly worried for her. The plot intriguing without being too convoluted (or conversely, too simple - I hate it when everything's signposted
a la da Vinci Code). Nothing was completely resolved. Yes, the bad things go away, but the world stays evil and corrupt... I like that. There's too much Hollywood BS with happy endings. It's also good to read something that can't be
pigeonholed easily. I read on night shift at work and when people asked me what it was about I genuinely couldn't tell them, certainly not in a way that they'd be able to relate to (it added mystery to my already mysterious persona
)
I enjoyed it... I think, so why am I so reluctant to read the rest?