Jeepers Creepers (2001)

lol

awwwwwww ure such a sweetie aint u?...............NOT!!!!!!
 
lol

wat?!??! u r! ask anyone!lol

nah i love u really!lol:)
 
lol

say something damnit! dont just cry or laugh...................................................:dead: lol
 
why is this SF?

ditto, god tell me why this Duel-Texas Chainsaw Massacre ripoff is scifi?
 
Hello again "King Donut" memeber Number Three!

At least it was a GOOD rip-off!:angryfire
maybe the Creeper was an alien...
 
Definitely a good horror film & worth seeing if you haven't seen it yet

:blush:
 
It's being shown on channel 4 tonight and somehow I've managed to miss this film completely so I'm going to record it and wimp that I am watch it in the morning!
 
You're not alone FeedMe, I'm doing the same thing. :D

Back tomorrow when I've watched it. ;)
 
So what do you two think of the film then?

I saw it ages ago when it was out at the cinema, and it started off so well; I thought "this is gonna be such a cool film". How disappointed was I. The first 30 minutes are brilliant but after that it plummet's to depths of absolute rubbish. I haven't seen the second film, but I really hope it's not more of the same.
 
Well I actually thought it was pretty scary. Once I'd seen his face though he sort of lost some of his edge. I suppose compared to some of the demons I've seen on Buffy he wsn't all that freaky. Nothing was really resolved and we weren't given any answers regarding the woman with prophetic dreams and why she got them but then I suppose it was left open for the sequal.

I liked the odd pieces of humour they slid in like the head being thrown into the van as an afterthought and the board advertising food behind the thing (what was he actually called in the film?) as he ate the man's tongue. Eww by the way.

I can't say I enjoyed the film beacuse I was pretty frightened (!) but as a horror movie I think it fulfilled its role as a film for being scary for the sake of it.
 
Really? Cos I didn't think it was scary at all. :rolleyes:

It started off pretty good, with the truck and the cave of dead people. But then it just went downhill.

Firstly, the monster thing was just... cheesy. Some maniac truck driver? Kind of scary. But a plastic-looking bat thing that makes slurpy noises when it eats? Please. :disgust: The killer from "Urban Legends" was scarier, and all they wore was a duffle-coat!

And there were so many loose ends left hanging, even if they did make a sequel. Like, why was he sewing the bodies back together again? And why weren't the bodies skeletons? And why did he only attack the boy and not the girl? It's a pretty stupid ending when the monster wins and the lead guy dies.

Basically, I thought the film was pants. I definately won't be bothering to watch the sequel. :p
 
Originally posted by little smaug
And there were so many loose ends left hanging, even if they did make a sequel. Like, why was he sewing the bodies back together again? And why weren't the bodies skeletons? And why did he only attack the boy and not the girl?
Click to expand...

Exactly! Where's the conclusion? It was scary for the sake of being scary which made it OK as long as you didn't care about the loose ends. Which I did. And I think lots of people do. Which makes it not so good. At face falue its scary (I know, I'm scared easily :rolleyes: ) and when it first came out it was raved about, at least the people I knew raved about it! But like you say, the whole rubbery wing monster thing was cheesy!

I would hope the sequal answers some of those questions otherwise I agree with you - the story was pants. I guess they were after a franchise. Is there anyone here who has seen JC2? Does it all get explained?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top