Who was the better character in the films?

Who was the best member of the Fellowship?

  • Frodo Baggins son of Drogo Baggins

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • Gandalf the Grey/Gandalf the White

    Votes: 35 23.6%
  • Aragorn son of Arathorn/King Elessar

    Votes: 34 23.0%
  • Legolas Greenleaf

    Votes: 12 8.1%
  • Gimli son of Gloin

    Votes: 12 8.1%
  • Boromir of Gondor

    Votes: 17 11.5%
  • Samwise Gamgee

    Votes: 18 12.2%
  • Meriadoc Brandybuck

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • Perigrin Took

    Votes: 8 5.4%
  • They were naf! I liked...

    Votes: 8 5.4%

  • Total voters
    148
Majimaume have u seen the behind the scene shots. Andy Serkis deserves a nomination. Everything he did was absolutely amazing. There couldn't be a better person to play Gollum, not even animation by itself could have done such a good job.
 
Yes I have seen the behind the scene shots and yes I agree with you. You know he started getting into the character before he even got the role. Whole days that he went around on his hands and knees like Gollom just so he might get the part.
 
I thought the Gollum charactered was based very much (in speech and looks)
on the version in Bakshi's animated film

Boromir and Samwise were by far the closest characters to those portrayed in the books , and I thought Elijah Wood was a poor Frodo

My favourite character from the films is not on the list , but it's Christopher Lee's Saruman , a suitable opponent for the mighty Gandalf , and (possibly) one last chance for Lee to play the bad guy
 
Aside from the fact that Aragorn was the hottest, but for me when he first "meets" Frodo, it was how I imagine from reading the book he would look. He is loyal and dependable and HOT. I portrays his character well. Although I also throught Gimli was good to.
 
[
The worst no question is legolas. In the books and the cartoon hes great. In the films apart from some of his fight scenes hes pants. Why? Because Borelando Bloom is the worst actor in the whole film, he does two good bits of acting 1) his look when Gandalf says "Balroq, a demon from the deep" and 2) his reaction to Gandalf's death. But this isn't supposed to be a rant about legolas is it :D

Kaenda: You made me laugh. So many young girls love Orlando in this role and I just could'nt see what they were on about. His character seems to lack any substance. Maybe this is dare I say it the fault of the writers or is it just Orlando himself?
 
Aside from the fact that Aragorn was the hottest, but for me when he first "meets" Frodo, it was how I imagine from reading the book he would look. He is loyal and dependable and HOT. I portrays his character well. Although I also throught Gimli was good to.
Does it really matter if he is hot or not. Viggo Mortensen played Aragorn really well.

[

Kaenda: You made me laugh. So many young girls love Orlando in this role and I just could'nt see what they were on about. His character seems to lack any substance. Maybe this is dare I say it the fault of the writers or is it just Orlando himself?
Orlando Bloom's fault. He isnt the greatest actor he just has some looks.

Boromir and Samwise were by far the closest characters to those portrayed in the books , and I thought Elijah Wood was a poor Frodo

My favourite character from the films is not on the list , but it's Christopher Lee's Saruman , a suitable opponent for the mighty Gandalf , and (possibly) one last chance for Lee to play the bad guy
I agree when you say Elijah Wood was a poor Frodo. He could have played it alot better.

Lee is the best. PJ hardly told him to do anything. You know when he gets stabbed on top of Orthank? He aparently tries to make the sound of a man being stabbed, which he has heard.
 
Was gonna suggest Farimir, because he let Sam and Frodo go. He resisted the power of the ring, and his own deep desires to live up to his brother in his fathers eyes, not to mention forfeiting his life. Was some great acting too.

Then I remembered in the second film he sacrificed himself (well almost) and many of his men, at the time they were most needed, because he wouldn't stand upto his father, or himself. And he got Eowyn, the git :)

Would go with Sam, but his portrayal in the film reminds me too much of Chief O'Brien in DS9. Kept expecting him to call Rosie "Barkeep".

Gonna have to go with Was gonna suggest Farimir, because he let Sam and Frodo go. He resisted the power of the ring, and his own deep desires to live up to his brother in his fathers eyes, not to mention forfeiting his life. Was some great acting too.

Then I remembered in the second film he sacrificed himself (well almost) and many of his men, at the time they were most needed, because he wouldn't stand upto his father, or himself. And he got Eowyn, the git :)

Would go with Sam, but his portrayal in the film reminds me too much of Chief O'Brien in DS9. Kept expecting him to call Rosie "Barkeep".

Gonna have to go with Hama. I always admired him for preventing his men from stopping Gandalf, when the fellowship go to meet Theoden. Was a shame him being killed so early on.
 
THE ONE RING...

It controlled everything... It was the brains and had everyone else enthralled!!! HAHAHAH!!! :D

The One Ring was actually Sauron..well a part of him so I don't think you can define it as a individual character. ;)
 
Boromir for

-kicking 7 shades of hell out of a load of uruks
-taking 3 shots and still kicking ass

If only he had taken his shield with him :D
 
Boromir, because I prefer ambiguous characters. The others were either too goody-good or too obviously evil. Another wonderful character was Gollum, for the same reason.
 
It would be interesting to see what would have happened if Boromir had been given the Ring - or even Gandalf for that matter

Such a noble and proud man is boromir , but the glimpse we get of his darker side when confronting Frodo is quite scary. Yet he does actually realise his mistake , and it's quite heartbreaking to see his realisation of what he had done - would he have again adopted such sinister traits? I guess we'll never know

On the other hand Gandalf says it would be dangerous for him to have the One Ring , as does Galadriel - yet both have the minor Rings. Whilst Galadriel has used hers to help preserve and protect her home , we see no indication of Gandalf using his , even in his most dire perils with the Balrog in Mordor or the Witch King at Minas Tirith. Under what circumstances WOULD he have used his lesser ring?

One other interesting point is what does the One Ring actually DO? What is it capable of ? The only things it seems to do to Frodo and Gollum is make thm invisible , and to cause them to live longer - the Ring Wraiths , far from fearing Frodo when he slips on the Ring on Weathertop actually mock him.

And as it apparently takes quite a while to corrupt the bearer , could Gandalf not have wielded the Ring against Saruman and Sauron , vanquishing both , and then destroying the Ring in the Cracks Of Doom before he fell under it's dominion? -

Or would Gandalf immeadiatley have become corrupted and evil the moment he wore the Ring? Certainly he appeared to fear even it's touch

Perhaps the only person , excepting Bombadil , who would have remained unchanged , is Aragorn
 
what always seemed to be the reason the powerful didn't take the ring to use against Sauron is that the more powerful the being, the faster it would corrupt them... absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Is it Galadriel or Gandalf who says to Frodo when he asks about peering into the minds of others and controlling them, that he would have to become vastly more powerful. I'm Sure its Galadriel.

Gandalf, i always assumed, used his ring often, as a strength to help him in his journeys. But the elven rings were NOT created for war or dominion, but to preserve and support.

Aragorn, unchanged? No i think not. The Hearts of Men are easily corrupted. And Isildur fell VERY quickly to the ring. Aragorn might last longer, but he'd fall too. Like Galadriel, in place of a dark lord Middle Earth would have a King, not dark, but handsome and terrible. All would love him an despair. Although, Aragorn was not a powerful individual anyway from all sources.

Certainly though, at the time of the War of the Ring, if the One Ring had come into Galadriel's hands, the Middle Earth would have suffered more than it ever did under Sauron, or could have under Saruman. Her innate gifts of perception, would have made her know all, see all and destroy all. She is at the time of the War, the most powerful of the Elves and its never clear whether that means she's stronger than either gandalf or saruman (when either was white).
 
what always seemed to be the reason the powerful didn't take the ring to use against Sauron is that the more powerful the being, the faster it would corrupt them... absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Is it Galadriel or Gandalf who says to Frodo when he asks about peering into the minds of others and controlling them, that he would have to become vastly more powerful. I'm Sure its Galadriel.

Gandalf, i always assumed, used his ring often, as a strength to help him in his journeys. But the elven rings were NOT created for war or dominion, but to preserve and support.

Aragorn, unchanged? No i think not. The Hearts of Men are easily corrupted. And Isildur fell VERY quickly to the ring. Aragorn might last longer, but he'd fall too. Like Galadriel, in place of a dark lord Middle Earth would have a King, not dark, but handsome and terrible. All would love him an despair. Although, Aragorn was not a powerful individual anyway from all sources.

Certainly though, at the time of the War of the Ring, if the One Ring had come into Galadriel's hands, the Middle Earth would have suffered more than it ever did under Sauron, or could have under Saruman. Her innate gifts of perception, would have made her know all, see all and destroy all. She is at the time of the War, the most powerful of the Elves and its never clear whether that means she's stronger than either gandalf or saruman (when either was white).

I wouldn't be so sure - he is , after all , the only one able to control the Palantir , and is able to grasp control even from the Dark Lord himself - something that even Gandalf feared to do; and we saw what happened to the minds of both Denethor (one of the strongest willed humans) and Saruman (at one time the wisest of the wise, and far more powerful than Gandalf until his 'regeneration'). Regarding Gandalf's ring - there seems to be no reference of his use of it in the text . In fact it would be quite interesting to know how he attained a ring given to the Elf-Lords.I would imagine that it would have offensive powers , otherwise it would not have been so attractive to the humans , or perhaps even the dwarves
 

Back
Top