smegMATIC
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2005
- Messages
- 4
Sorry for munging your username. I could have sworn I saw "SPANKING". Oh well.
The well-worn chestnut about King being "chewing gum for the brain" is oft-quoted amongst the haughty types that read Milton while taking a dump - or at least, won't admit to sullying their intellect with lesser authors. What these :kd: types of personalities really dislike is the popularity of King as well as the fact that his characters are generally regular Toms, Dicks, and Harrys who follow a comprehensible plot unfettered by existential drivel as one might find in, say, Vonnegut.
I found nothing wrong with the re-telling of Exodus in a modern context amidst the rubble of a crumbled civilisation. Really, novels are, when boiled down to their basic ingredients, all good-versus-evil stories. You may remember, if you posess a rigorous education, that a novel consists of (a) establishment of conflict (b) climax (c) resolution of conflict (d) denoument. Proper introduction of characters and their motives add, rather than detract, from The Stand... and I had no trouble keeping track of them either.
I would agree that a reading on whether King is a good author or not would depend largely upon "compared to whom?".
The well-worn chestnut about King being "chewing gum for the brain" is oft-quoted amongst the haughty types that read Milton while taking a dump - or at least, won't admit to sullying their intellect with lesser authors. What these :kd: types of personalities really dislike is the popularity of King as well as the fact that his characters are generally regular Toms, Dicks, and Harrys who follow a comprehensible plot unfettered by existential drivel as one might find in, say, Vonnegut.
I found nothing wrong with the re-telling of Exodus in a modern context amidst the rubble of a crumbled civilisation. Really, novels are, when boiled down to their basic ingredients, all good-versus-evil stories. You may remember, if you posess a rigorous education, that a novel consists of (a) establishment of conflict (b) climax (c) resolution of conflict (d) denoument. Proper introduction of characters and their motives add, rather than detract, from The Stand... and I had no trouble keeping track of them either.
I would agree that a reading on whether King is a good author or not would depend largely upon "compared to whom?".