tinkerdan
∞<Q-Satis
I read the book first long ago and when I saw the movie I had to pretty much say, "What?"
So I reread the book just in case; because memory can be pretty dicey at times. Still had to say, "What?"
I like the movie a lot so it didn't destroy the book for me because it was like apples and oranges.
They bore some similarities and one claimed to be based on the other; I'll let you fight that one out.
Anyway: I would agree that they are both good in their own right and if we were to judge the movie as to how well it represented the book I would have to fail it; but I don't think I have to do that because they really would have made a pretty crappy movie if they made it faithful to the book.
So I reread the book just in case; because memory can be pretty dicey at times. Still had to say, "What?"
I like the movie a lot so it didn't destroy the book for me because it was like apples and oranges.
They bore some similarities and one claimed to be based on the other; I'll let you fight that one out.
Anyway: I would agree that they are both good in their own right and if we were to judge the movie as to how well it represented the book I would have to fail it; but I don't think I have to do that because they really would have made a pretty crappy movie if they made it faithful to the book.