Stephen King...again..
I like King, so I don't want to make this seem like a cudgeling, this is purely my opinion of this and some of his other more eccentric works.
I definitely like (a lot of) King's work, which is why my disappointment is so strong with some of his later works.
IT? Classic.
Night Shift? A favourite. C
ujo, Pet Sematery and
Needful Things? Some of the best in the genre, IMO, along with Salem's Lot.
The Stand,
Tommyknockers,
The Shining and
Firestarter were over-long, to my mind, but still well worth the time to read (and I admired the epic scale of
The Stand, especially the descriptions of the spiralling chaos as human civilisation is destroyed by a virus).
Green Mile,
Dolores Claiborne and
Rose Madder were a bit of departure from his usual visceral horror style, but still enjoyable and absorbing. I also liked his collaboration with Peter Straub on
The Talisman and
Black House, although I preferred thecomplex evil characters to his cardboard cutout Good Guys (tm).
Gerald's Game,
The Dead Zone and
Thinner felt a bit clumsy to me, but I felt I could see where King was honing his technique and practicising with ideas, and later works showed improvement. They were still satisfyingly trashy and creepy, and hit a lot of the right horror nerves.
Then he started throwing out stuff like
Bag of Bones, Desperation, Imsomnia and
Dream Catcher (Not to mention
From a Buick 8) - WTF?! Ugh, I hated them. Sentimental, weak and self-indulgent. King has had enough success that I imagine he can pretty much dictate terms to his publishers now, but this stuff was wandering all over the place - not to mention the blatant (if a little strange) Christian messages being pushed in
Desperation and a need to link all the books and characters together in off-hand references to each other.
The reviews of
Lisey's Story aren't encouraging thus far - do we need more cutesy characters with yet more in-joke slang and repressed memories? More alien parallel worlds? Has our world run out of the potential for horror, after 9/11? (I only say this because King is, well, fairly America-centric).
Curiosity may drive me to borrow it from my local library at some point, but I'm not holding out hope for more than an average, mildly gripping read. At best, I won't be actively hoping for his main female lead to die a horrible death. (King's female characters are a whole 'nother topic)
I probably should stop the novel-by-novel dissection before the mods ask me to take it to a proper King forum.
I'd be interested in your further thoughts, Commonmind and Boaz, if you have any further to add. Style-wise, I don't think King can hold a candle to GRRM, but I do feel he has something unique to offer, and his commercial success is well earned. The ability to write enduring popular novels is possibly under-rated by devotees of the 'Writing as High Art' school. Alas, I fear we may have already seen the last of the great horror novels (or even short stories) by King. And I'm not talking about anything he's published after 2000.