Ohmygodohmygod

They won't. Dany will probably be at least 16 in the TV series, and probably played by an actress who's 18 or older. Not because of any sense of propriety, but simply that if it takes 6-7 seasons to tell the story and the story only spans 4 years+ over the course of it (2-2.5 years pass in Books 1-5, presumbly a similar amount in the books to come), then it will be much more obvious with younger actors than the older ones.

With some characters, like Bran, it's possible they'd consider filming all of his scenes for say the first three books at once, to avoid this problem of aging, but for someone with as much screen time as Dany, that's unlikely to happen.

well actually the dude playing Ocatvianus, was youg when signed, and he's getting older was an important aspect of the story, that said Rome took several years in filming
 
Well, it is on HBO after all, so I don't think they'll shy away from some of the grittier and more "questionable" issues in the series. Such as Dany and Drogo. I do agree they will make Dany older like mid-teens such as Nathalie Portman in Star Wars or Ana Paquin in X-Men.

I can't wait for the Red Wedding...I have had that scene burned in my head ever since I read ASOS. The high pitched music, slithing Catelyn's throat...will make for the best TV since...well since!

I wonder if other channels like Showcase here in Canada and A&E will eventually (a couple years after the debut) pick up the series like they did for The Sopranos and Six Feet Under. Anyways, GRRM said not to be surprised to see spots promoting the series next year. May be sooner than we all think.
 
well actually the dude playing Ocatvianus, was youg when signed, and he's getting older was an important aspect of the story, that said Rome took several years in filming

True. However, they're also getting around this by having a big jump-forward in episode six of the second season of Rome, and they bring in a new actor to play Octavius as a fully-grown adult, which I know is not a popular move among some fans. Necessary, however.
 
Hi all,
sorry if some-one has mentioned this elsewhere....

I'm thrilled to hear of a forthcoming HBO production...

BUT (and that is a very big but), George's involvement in this production - to whatever extent - may potentially slow down the writing of future novels, don't you think?? As it is now, the suspense waiting for ADWD is killing me!!

Dyffeg
 
I doubt the story will every get finished, it will remain unfinished
 
Hi all,
BUT (and that is a very big but), George's involvement in this production - to whatever extent - may potentially slow down the writing of future novels, don't you think?? As it is now, the suspense waiting for ADWD is killing me!!

That is why GRRM has said on his website that he is will only be writing the script for one episode per season.
 
It makes me wonder why bother doing any? If he trusts these people to write every other episode to an acceptible standard, why insist on writing one? Does he expect it to be far better than the rest, for some reason, or will it be one that is the most important - Ned's death in aGoT, the Red Wedding in aSoS.... Just seems strange.
 
I figured he would handle either the big scenes or the ones he wants to get just right, like maybe Tyrion-heavy episodes.
plus Im sure he just wants to do it. He has written for series before, Im sure he'd like his name on some of his own work. :)
 
I can't imagine it wouldn't be called 'George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire', isn't that enough recognition....? But I see your point, I guess. As long as it doesn't cut too far into novel-writing time.
 
Actually I thought he would write the first episodes because a first impression has the longest impact. It kind of sets the tone and I think GRRM is somewhat sensitive to his rabid fans (i.e. us) and tyring to get others hooked on the series, even if most will never pick up the books (i.e. the rest of the world).
 
Was just musing, and a couple of folks seem to think that ASoIaF wouldnt last more than a few seasons on HBO.

So of the authors on the Chronicles, Tolkein has 15k posts, Martin has 11k posts and Rowling has 9k posts. I think the next highest has 1.5k posts.

Seems to me that there is sufficient interest in Martins storytelling that the shows would draw great ratings even before word of mouth struck. I can see the show doing very well, but again it will largely depend on their ability to keep budget in check.

And I'd be willing to bet its safe to say, we all know alot of people who would love the plot but don't have the patience to read the books. (I'd say about 85% of the people i know don't read other than the newspaper.)
 
I'm not sure what kind of fan base they thought they had in tow for a series on a dysfunctional family running a funeral home, but that did alright. Or for a brutal prison series, but that's done just fine.

Drawing people it to watch has almost as much to do with the quality of the overall production as it does with the base material.

Obviously no guarantees with HBO cancelling both Deadwood and Carnival which had a lot of devotees, but it certainly isn't dead in the water do to the subject matter.
 
It was my understanding they were naming it "Winter". Or, at least preliminarily, using that as a title. I think it would be great. "A Song of Ice and Fire" is far too long a title for a TV show, and adding GRRM's name to it would be an awful idea. It needs to be something flashy, contemporary, and intriguing to be a hit among a non-fantasy TV audience.

Sopranos
Big Love
Deadwood
Six Feet Under
Rome

---See the pattern?
 
Why on Earth would they change a title that already has recognition value amongst not only fans, but say folks who frequent the rest of this website, not to mention anyone who may have picked it up in a store, or seen a reference in a newspaper or on a website? I assumed each season would be named for the books, ie A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, etc...

Winter doesn't really make a whole lot of sense, I feel. If they want something short they could always go with 'GRRM's ASoIaF: AGoT.'
 
Hehe Oh Winter's Sorrow...you went and said FOX.

I have been (privately, thankfully) coming up with how FOX would cast the series. I guess I would call it the anti speculation, or who would most horribly fulfil the role...

For example...Tyrion: Gary Coleman, Cersei: Nicole Richie, Eddard: Gilbert Godfreid

I will save some of my other putrified choices, but after those 3 I think my criteria is evident.

"What you talking 'bout Cersei!!"
 
Gilbert Gottfried as Ned?!?! I couldn't think of a worse choice.

As for calling the show Winter, isn't that only half the story? Or does that tell us who eventually wins?

Mayhaps (I'm the new Lord of the Crossing) the title should be Ice and Fire, or Seasons. How about something that sums up the political machinations, like The Iron Throne?

Seeing how the War of the Roses was an inspiration for the series, how about Wolves and Lions or something stupid like Beast Wars?
 
As for calling the show Winter, isn't that only half the story? Or does that tell us who eventually wins?

I'm not sure about it telling us who wins; I suppose we'll have to see. I like the name, because in a way, the looming winter is a metaphor for the coming together of impending doom....but that's just me

Mayhaps (I'm the new Lord of the Crossing) the title should be Ice and Fire, or Seasons. How about something that sums up the political machinations, like The Iron Throne?
Ice and Fire gets my vote. Seasons sounds like some awful "Thornbird"-esque soap opera series. The Iron Throne? Hrmmm...maybe we should stray away from the whole fantasy schmaltzy thing.


Seeing how the War of the Roses was an inspiration for the series, how about Wolves and Lions or something stupid like Beast Wars?


ditto for these...beast wars??? c'mon, that's a stupid video game from 10 years ago, i think.
 
Back
Top