Having read through this thread I feel I must respond to some of the comments on the various books by Bernard Cornwell. I am not a publicist for the man nor am I anything to do with his publishers, but I am somebody who enjoys and appreciates a good historical novel, well written and historically accurate. His books fill those criteria for me.
Yes, some of them do run pretty slowly on occasion so some people may become bored in reading them. But the pace of any historical novel must, to some extent, reflect the pace of the period being written about and if there were a few years where nothing much happened, then it must be very difficult for an author to generate excitement for his characters during those periods. But, to my mind, this is one of the areas in which Cornwell scores as he is able to maintain the reader’s interest (well, my interest at least) even through such times by introducing period detail about which one would otherwise be unaware.
As for other areas in which he shows his mastery, there are few better authors at writing battle scenes and through his pen I have stood with the Confederate regiments in the cornfield at Sharpsburg, my mouth dry from biting cartridges, wondering if the flood of blue clad figures will ever stop. I have heard the French cannons at Waterloo and known that there can be nothing which might prevent Napoleon’s army from running right over us, unless Blucher comes. Many other places I have, from the comfort of my armchair, come as close as any modern man might to living through the world changing battles of which Mr. Cornwell writes – all because of his genius at describing such events.
No doubt there are bits and pieces of historical criticism which might be aimed at some of his books. This, I think, can probably be said of almost any author of such works, but if there are I am sure they are few and far between and, to be honest, a few small errors of the “but the Fifth Hussars had blue saddle blankets not green ones” really don’t matter to me in the wider interests of telling a jolly good story. I am content to sit back and enjoy it and be thankful that I am able to be sitting back to do so rather than having to be out there, a couple of hundred years ago, (or however long ago it was) doing it.
Those of you who have not yet read his works, I recommend them wholeheartedly and, in the case of the Sharpe series, do start at the chronological beginning, with “Sharpe’s Tiger” and do not concern yourselves with irrelevant questions about why he may have written them in the order he did. Just read and enjoy.
Bernard Cornwell stands very high up on my long list of well-liked authors and, I suspect, I have many, many companions in this view.
For my first post on this forum this is probably long and opinionated enough, but the object of a forum such as this is, I think, to discuss and offer opinions on such matters, so there is my two pennyworth.
I offer my respects and good wishes to all here and I am sure I shall enjoy myself reading your words and perhaps even commenting on other threads.
Cayleb