O Fortunate Floridian

Ningauble

Lovecraftian
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
745
I got the latest volume of Lovecraft's letters today: O Fortunate Floridian, published by University of Tampa Press. I haven't had the time to read it yet (obviously), but it looks so exceptionally nice. It's got a photo of HPL, a photo of R. H. Barlow, and a little drawing by Barlow (of a coffin) prefaces every section. And the contents are not only 161 letters to Barlow, his mother, and Charles Blackburn Johnston, but also Barlow's memoir of Lovecraft and his own autobiographical writings. And as usual, plenty of interesting notes by Messrs. Joshi & Schultz.


Highly recommended!! :)
 
Thanks for keeping us ... errrrm, posted ... on this one. I suppose that means I should be receiving my copy soon; very much looking forward to it.....
 
From the editor bio in the back, it seems that Univ. of Tampa Press will also be the publisher of Joshi's revised Lovecraft bibliography. It will be out in 2008, I think.
 
From the editor bio in the back, it seems that Univ. of Tampa Press will also be the publisher of Joshi's revised Lovecraft bibliography. It will be out in 2008, I think.

Thanks for the update... though I'd thought Hippocampus had that one on the table.... At any rate, my copy has apparently gone astray, so they're sending me a replacement. *sigh* Just got to love the holiday mails, yes?
 
Thanks for the update... though I'd thought Hippocampus had that one on the table....

So did I. But this is the second time I've seen this information, so there must be something to it.

At any rate, my copy has apparently gone astray, so they're sending me a replacement. *sigh* Just got to love the holiday mails, yes?

:(:( And so there were only 499 copies of the first edition in the world...
 
So did I. But this is the second time I've seen this information, so there must be something to it.

I'll have to keep an eye out for this then, as it's something I'll definitely want -- heck, need -- to get. Perhaps I should check with Derrick at Hippocampus on this one.....

:(:( And so there were only 499 copies of the first edition in the world...

Perhaps. Then again, with the holiday mails, it may just be taking the long way home....:rolleyes:
 
Well, I've received an email from Sean at UT press confirming that they are doing Joshi's bibliography. The MS. is supposed to be in this spring, but he didn't mention any idea of when the book itself will be released. I would imagine, though, that this is going to be one I'd best start saving up for, considering....
 
Well, I've received an email from Sean at UT press confirming that they are doing Joshi's bibliography. The MS. is supposed to be in this spring, but he didn't mention any idea of when the book itself will be released. I would imagine, though, that this is going to be one I'd best start saving up for, considering....

And AFAIK, it's going to be two volumes!
It's going to be big -- I can only speak for the section on Lovecraft appearances in Swedish, but that section has been expanded several hundred percent. :D
 
And AFAIK, it's going to be two volumes!
It's going to be big -- I can only speak for the section on Lovecraft appearances in Swedish, but that section has been expanded several hundred percent. :D

Considering Joshi's tendencies with such things, "big" is something of an understatement. (And that is not meant derogatorily; I wish I had one-tenth of Joshi's energy....)
 
Is he pretty much the most significant/influential Lovecraft scholar of all time?

Ooof! That might be biting off a bit much. I'd say he's certainly among the most important Lovecraftian textual scholars there's ever been; also that he has written quite a bit of the most important interpretations of Lovecraft's philosophy (as seen in both his fiction and non-fiction). But Joshi himself owes a lot to such as Matthew H. Onderdonk, Dirk W. Mosig, J. Vernon Shea, and even Fritz Leiber (who didn't write a great deal of Lovecraftian scholarly articles, but those he did are quite good).

Part of the problem is that, for a long time now, Lovecraftian scholarship has diversified into several different subspecies (if you will), each of which has proven of immense worth in varying ways, from the textual, historical, and politico-philosophical aspects that Joshi has done so well, to deconstructionist examinations such as those Donald R. Burleson has written (which I personally find quite fascinating, though they've stirred more than a little controversy at times), to mythic and psychological work such as Mosig and St. Armand have done, or approaching his work from the standpoint of religious studies, as Robert M. Price has... and there's a fair amount of work being done on his earlier writings for the amateur press, which is adding considerably to our understanding of various aspects of his later, more famous work. (Phillip (ghyle) has done some very good pieces on certain aspects of this, for instance.)

I'm not sure one can point to any one single person as "the most significant/influential", overall. But Joshi certainly wins that in the area of ferreting out the most accurate texts, along with revisions/alterations done in various printings by Lovecraft, etc., providing marvelous insights into how meticulously Lovecraft approached his fiction, in order to convey extremely precise nuances in meaning and emotional response. This has, indeed, led to a reexamination of Lovecraft by literary scholars in general, and a rethinking of his place in American letters.... So, on that level... if Joshi isn't, he's darned close....
 
I would say he is the most important living critic and scholar, for those reasons, as well as the important ones also of acting as OE for The Esoteric Order of Dagon amateur press association, and for the simple fact of stimulating Penguin and others to publish Lovecraft. Then there is his work elsewhere, as editor for Hippocampus Pres, and in which capacity as instrumental in opening up some of the sources of Lovecraft (in the Lovecraft's Library series of reprints, for example).

More important to me, though, is the fact that he is a very warm, caring and open person, and he has extended both his hand in friendship, and in interest in my own minor contributions.
 
Just a sidenote on your last post, J. D., most of my work so far has been with the poetry, and that is the niche that I am carving out for myself, with sidelines. The concordance is, I predict, going to be a major deal, along with the bibliogrphy in terms of importance for poetry scholars when it comes to Lovecraft.
 
Thanks all for the contributions to date.

Has Joshi ever written a Locraft pastiche or any other work of fiction? If not do you think he would do a good job or does it require more than just a close understanding of the subject matter to produce an excellent fascimile of the orignal or something along similar lines that refelcts that era of pulp fiction?
 
Thanks all for the contributions to date.

Has Joshi ever written a Locraft pastiche or any other work of fiction? If not do you think he would do a good job or does it require more than just a close understanding of the subject matter to produce an excellent fascimile of the orignal or something along similar lines that refelcts that era of pulp fiction?

Ummm, well.... Joshi's opinion of Lovecraftian pastiche is, shall we say, not a high one. However, he did commit such a thing to paper in his youth, and it was even a very Derlethian take on the mythos. Robert M. Price reprinted it in Acolytes of Cthulhu. It's an entertaining little romp, and shows the influence of of the entire Weird Tales "school". The title is "The Recurring Doom", should you like to look up any more about it.....

To clarify (which I should have done in the earlier post), yes, Phillip's work is with the poetry -- fittingly, as he himself is a poet, and can bring both the academic and creative insights to bear on this aspect of things.

On Joshi... I corresponded with him many, many years ago (ca. the mid-1980s), and I'd agree with that assessment. He not only argued his points cogently and passionately, but encouraged the same from others. A wonderful person to help hone one's abilities on this, and a fascinating person to deal with. Even though it's been about two decades since, from what I've heard that hasn't changed....
 
It hasn't changed over the decade that I've been corresponding with him. That is, since the mid-90s. If anything, S. T. has diversified a lot more recently.
 
It hasn't changed over the decade that I've been corresponding with him. That is, since the mid-90s. If anything, S. T. has diversified a lot more recently.

In what way(s)? I'm aware of his critical work on so many figures both in and out of the weird fiction field (including H. L. Mencken, for instance). As always, I find his critical works on them to be thought-provoking and lively. Joshi has a rather pungent wit himself, and his work is always well worth reading.

Glad to hear, though, that this is an aspect that hasn't changed. He and his work have had a major influence on me in several ways, as well -- much as HPL himself has -- and I think my life has been richer because of them....

And on the subject of the thread: finally got my copy of O Fortunate Floridian -- absolutely beautiful book! Even just dipping into the first letter (all I had time for with my busy schedule today) I was already charmed and fascinated.... This one is definitely going to be a treat....
 
And on the subject of the thread: finally got my copy of O Fortunate Floridian -- absolutely beautiful book! Even just dipping into the first letter (all I had time for with my busy schedule today) I was already charmed and fascinated.... This one is definitely going to be a treat....


It certainly is! I have less than 100 pages left now, and the book is pure delight -- maybe one of the most interesting HPL Letters collections I've read so far. A couple of typos, but few of them bad (Barlow's mother's name was Bernice, not Eunice -- someone else spotted that, not I -- and Mrs. Clark wasn't born in 1847).
It provides lots of interesting information on Barlow, much of which was completely unknown to me (e.g., that he worked with Ursula Le Guin's father when he was in California), and which will be of great use to me as I'm going to write an article on Barlow for a Swedish fantasy-themed web community.
 
Hadn't realized that he'd worked with Kroeber, either... that is very interesting.... Good luck with the piece on Barlow; is it going to be available here, as well?
 

Similar threads


Back
Top