iansales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 3,447
the illustration in the book is a black and white line drawing, it hasn't been coloured in at all,
Some portions of the drawing have been blacked in, increasing its likeness to an astronaut in a spaceship.
there are many other things about our past that still haven't been satisfactorily answered that Von Daniken didn't mention.
In other words, he picks only those which might fit his theories...
why are extraterrestrials more unlikely than a Supreme being/God/Creator?
I never said there was a God. I suppose one is as likely as the other, but then I don't believe in either.
the Universe is a big place and many respected scientists believe that intelligent life has, does or will exist somewhere else out there.
what is preposterous about the idea that they visited us and helped shape homo sapiens as a race at a time when we, as a species, were not advanced enough to completely understand their nature, but still associated them with the stars?
Far too many things are preposterous about it:
1) how did they get here? The distances involved are, well, astronomical.
2) why would they come here?
3) if they did come here, why did they leave?
4) if they did come here, why help us?
5) why is the "evidence" of their visit so ambiguous as to prove nothing?
why do so many of the Gods travell in flying chariots? especially those that are omnipotent who should not have any need for transport.
why do ancient texts describe wars fought with weapons of mass destruction that were unrecognisable untill the invention and use of atomic weapons?
Gods have great powers. That's why they're gods. There wouldn't be much point in having gods who were like normal people. You may as well worship your next-door neighbour. And how is he going to intercede when your son dies in a freak agricultural accident? Besides, why should your next-door neighbour pick one person to be king and then allow himself to be ordered about by him?