Books you just can't get into

So far the only books I coudn't get into have been Ombria In Shadow and The Tower at Stony Wood by Patricia McKillip. They both seemed like bad imitations of old fairy tales.

I didn't enjoy Finity's End and Fortress of Owls by C.T.SHERRYH. Not for any specific reason that I can remember though.

I thought C.T SHERRYH was too weird name to be true since its so close to the name of one of my favorite authors.

Her name is C.J Cherryh ;)


Those two books arent near being one of her best so if you are new to her dont give up. She is very good !
 
harry what's his namer...*snooze*

Lotr I read every few months and have done so since age 8. the silmarillion however....*snooze*

WoT.....didn't make it past the first book.....

and....someone's going to shoot me for this...

the chronicles of narnia.

there...I said it...*runs for cover with my phillip k. dick collection in tow*
 
Chronicles of Narnia put me to sleep too....both the book and the movie.
 
TO get back to Dean Koonts.
His work used to be great, but has deteriorated in the last half dozen books or so. He should keep his writing fast paced to match the action, but when his description of a demon bursting through the floor of a church takes about 3 pages - well it just kills the pace stone dead.
Elaborate descriptiveness has it's place - look at Tolkein - but in a fast paced thriller it can stilt the whole novel.
 
Dragonbone Chair (Williams) - couldn't make it through book 1, may try again one day.

This is an interesting one to me, as I also started it way back in my adolescent fantasy heyday and found it incredibly dull and quit partway through book 1. A few years later, I tried again and finished book 1 and mildly enjoyed it but not enough to go on with the series. Fast forward 10 years and I picked up book 1 again a little over a year ago and now I'm a good way into book 3/4 (depending on your publication version) and this is the most I've loved any book/series since I was a teenager.

Others have mentioned the Foundation series, with which I somewhat agree. Oddly, I liked the first book best. As in his Robot series, the "rules" are very clever and work in ways that even now feel somewhat novel. The Seldon Plan often works as well by doing "nothing" as by engaging in some epic, heroic act. However, I found the Mule storyline far less interesting, particularly its resolution.

Harry Potter is an interesting one too. The first 2 books are very children-oriented and underwhelming. However, the characters (much like the readers I presume) grow tremendously from book 3 on, and some truly dark and challenging themes emerge. Umbridge remains one of the most loathsome villains in all of literature for me.
 
For me it was Hermann Hesse’s The Glass Bead Game (I think I attempted it twice), but it has been many years since I tried to read it. I think my adult self will find it a better read than my 15 year old self.
 
Ive tried twice to read Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow I just cannot seem to get into it.
 
When I was a teenager in southern Oregon 1969 and into the early 1970s, it was easy to find cheap used paperback copies of sword-and-planet and sword-and-sorcery novels (and new copies, of course). The stuff was all over the place. As much as I liked Burroughs when I first began to read him in 9th grade (A Fighting Man of Mars) and similar stories of swordfights, escapes, perilous journeys beset by monsters, etc., having read a few thousand pages of such material, I began to find that it took an effort to push through such books to the end, if these sorts of things were all they had to offer. They'd become kind of tedious. The books accumulated while things I was more interested in were read, and reread. I've been recollecting that time and realizing how it came to be that I had a fair amount of such stuff that I never read. I don't believe I ever read ERB's five Venus books, or Howard's Almuric, or The Secret People by John Wyndham under a pseudonym, or Williams's Jongor of Lost Land, or Brett Sterling's Danger Planet, or Brackett's The Ginger Star -- all books I know I had or think I probably owned many years ago. Recently I tried to reread Burroughs' s The Gods of Mars, and, as with A Princess of Mars a few years ago, I found that it wasn't holding my interest -- so why persist? That's also happened with some rereadings of Robert E. Howard that I have tried in recent years.

I also recently tried to reread some of August Derleth's imitations of Lovecraft. They were unfinishable.

Yet really good things from even earlier days still please me. I'm now, once again, in the third of Lloyd Alexander's Prydain books (The Castle of Llyr). Given the humanity of the characters and other elements, these books are actually, in some ways, more grown up than the pulp stuff. I've been finding the Prydain books to be even better than I remembered.

Going back even farther in my youthful reading -- all these years I saved some 1960s Gold Key reprints of Donald Duck and Uncle Scrooge comics by Carl Barks -- "Luck of the North," "Back to the Klondike," etc. I read those stories again, for the umpteenth time, recently, and they still give me a lot of pleasure, not entirely explained simply by affection for them as things I have always liked.

Back to adventure tales -- I have found that I can still enjoy Rider Haggard's books, with few exceptions (kind of bogged down with Pearl Maiden). But I'm sure a factor there is that I know he was a favorite of C. S. Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien, two of my favorite authors.
 
Last edited:
When I was a teenager in southern Oregon 1969 and into the early 1970s, it was easy to find cheap used paperback copies of sword-and-planet and sword-and-sorcery novels (and new copies, of course). The stuff was all over the place. As much as I liked Burroughs when I first began to read him in 9th grade (A Fighting Man of Mars) and similar stories of swordfights, escapes, perilous journeys beset by monsters, etc., having read a few thousand pages of such material, I began to find that it took an effort to push through such books to the end, if these sorts of things were all they had to offer. They'd become kind of tedious. The books accumulated while things I was more interested in were read, and reread. I've been recollecting that time and realizing how it came to be that I had a fair amount of such stuff that I never read. I don't believe I ever read ERB's five Venus books, or Howard's Almuric, or The Secret People by John Wyndham under a pseudonym, or Williams's Jongor of Lost Land, or Brett Sterling's Danger Planet, or Brackett's The Ginger Star -- all books I know I had or think I probably owned many years ago. Recently I tried to reread Burroughs' s The Gods of Mars, and, as with A Princess of Mars a few years ago, I found that it wasn't holding my interest -- so why persist? That's also happened with some rereadings of Robert E. Howard that I have tried in recent years.

I also recently tried to reread some of August Derleth's imitations of Lovecraft. They were unfinishable.

Yet really good things from even earlier days still please me. I'm now, once again, in the third of Lloyd Alexander's Prydain books (The Castle of Llyr). Given the humanity of the characters and other elements, these books are actually, in some ways, more grown up than the pulp stuff. I've been finding the Prydain books to be even better than I remembered.

Going back even farther in my youthful reading -- all these years I saved some 1960s Gold Key reprints of Donald Duck and Uncle Scrooge comics by Carl Barks -- "Luck of the North," "Back to the Klondike," etc. I read those stories again, for the umpteenth time, recently, and they still give me a lot of pleasure, not entirely explained simply by affection for them as things I have always liked.

With some books and some stories the old adage " You can't go home again " applies. These stories were fresh, new and exciting when you first read them. The second time around , the shortcoming and flaws become more evident.
 
Last edited:
Well, Baylor, I don't know if, for me, it was the second time around that did it, since I reread many, at least, of the Barsoom books, etc. not very long after that first reading, and still liked 'em! But you're basically right.
 
It will have to be the Thomas Covenant books. They are probably the bane of my reading life. I can't get into them at all simply because the character put me off completely. I can't bring myself to like him enough to keep reading.

Same!
 
I thought C.T SHERRYH was too weird name to be true since its so close to the name of one of my favorite authors.

Her name is C.J Cherryh ;)


Those two books arent near being one of her best so if you are new to her dont give up. She is very good !

Definitely--her Alliance/Union books are amazing and her two-book series about the elves was lovely.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top