If you could crown anyone...

Qhorin Halfhand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2008
Messages
63
I was reading this thread: http://www.sffchronicles.co.uk/forum/46551-best-hand-of-the-king.html

While I was reading it and writing my reasons for not crowning Tyrion, it occurred to me that the people most suited to ruling Westeros are people who have absolutely no claim to the throne. The Targaryens have shown a tendancy to quite often make a huge hash of the job and the Baratheons don't do much better.

So if you could choose any character, no matter how minor, from Westeros to be king, who would it be? Personally, I would look for a combination of competence demonstrated in Tywin Lannister balanced with a sense of honour like you see in Eddard. Either one would have been a relatively effective ruler but either would eventually see their reign end in blood, Ned because he wouldn't have stomped out people like the Lannisters who would eventually challenge his power and Tywin because he would eventually take measures too extreme against someone and end up with someone opposing him (eg. another Robb Stark).

For me, I can't decide. It is between Tyrion Lannister, who demonstrates considerable capacity for deceit and political maneuvering as well as a concern for the smallfolk. The main problem with Tyrion as a ruler is that he's a dwarf. It sounds horrible to say but we see in the books that even when he is the only person in King's Landing looking out for the smallfolk, he is hated. If he were king, the first time something bad happened (famine, plague, etc) people would react with violence against their "tainted ruler" and probably riot.

My other choice would be Doran Martell. He demonstrates a very similar sort of competence to either Tywin or Tyrion Lannister; he can be quite ruthless but seems to demonstrate qualities such as loyalty and care for the realm. My foundation for choosing him is a lot less solid, he just seems to be the kind of guy who would be a strong and effective ruler. The main problems with him would be (a) his health which obviously isn't good and so he probably wouldn't last and (b) his obvious loyalty to the Targaryen cause demonstrates that maybe he has absolutely no desire for rule. On the other hand, his desire is to marry one of his children to the Targaryens, who have a claim to the throne so maybe he does have desire for rule.

As more discussion, who would you choose as the Hand for your choice(s)?

Oddly, I think I would put someone like Jon Arryn as Tyrion's hand. A hugely powerful noble (Warden of the East) and obviously able to draw on a lot of respect from pretty much anyone given the strength of his line and house. Tyrion wouldn't need a hand who could manage politics and economics and so on for him, he would need a hand who could enhance the standing of his rule with a noble name and military power. He would need a member of one of the great houses. His reasons for not having his father would be obvious, Mace Tyrell and Renly Baratheon are useless and Doran would too unhealthy and doens't bring enough military power. Dorne is too divorced from Westeros for Doran Martell to enhance Tyrion's image. I think Jon Arryn would be a better choice than Ned Stark, he seems more willing to engage in underhanded methods (Varys obviously brought his information to Jon Arryn more than Robert). I think he'd be effective at facilitating Tyrion as a ruler.

For Doran Martell, you would need someone more capable of being proactive and rule in the kings stead a lot more because of his health. I would say Doran Martell would need a Petyr Baelish or a Tywin Lannister, someone capable of ruling in concordance with him, but taking their lead from him. The problem with both of those choices is that neither would be loyal to any significant degree. I can't think of anyone really suitable for Doran's hand. Tyrion may in fact be the best choice but that could just be my brain trying to have my cake and eat it too.
 
Interesting topic. I am eager to read people's proposals.

I take the question to mean, if I were a player in The Game of Thrones and I could gain control of King's Landing, then who would I support in their claim of the Iron Throne?

I'll start by saying that there are no perfect candidates. No one person can be proficient in all the required fields of leadership and goverment nor hold a perfect balance in dispensing justice and mercy. Candidates could be capable in many areas while being deficient in others. For example, Robert Baratheon possessed great personal charm for inspiring loyalty in addition to having a reputation for military heroism while at the same closing his eyes to social justice and bankrupting the government. In Robert's own words he "was a better king than Aerys."

Here are some of the potentials that come quickly to mind... Daenarys Targaryen, Stannis Baratheon, Renly Baratheon, Eddard Stark, Tywin Lannister, Aemon Targaryen, Doran Martell, and Tommen Baratheon. They are all from high noble houses. Not being Andals nor Targaryens would put a damper on Stark's and Martell's causes. Never ruling the entire Seven Kingdoms would also dampen the Lannister's case. Politically, I think the surest bets would be to champion Baratheon or Targaryen claimant. And knowing what I know from AGOT to AFFC, I'd say Aemon is the most qualified to rule.

Barring real connections and qualifications, I find a number of other people very intersting. Asha Greyjoy, Jon Snow, Gendry Waters, Petyr Baelish, Tyrion Lannister, Rickon Stark, Sansa Lannister, Margaery Baratheon, Edric Storm, "Black" Walder Frey, Quentyn Martell, and Garlan Tyrell could find some support and would be intriguing cases.

I don't have time to try and analyze the practicalities of all the people I've listed. But for the person (not already crowned) who possesses the best combination of hereditary claim, intelligence, justice, leadership, magnetism, diplomacy, military prowess and patience (i.e. what I think are the main qualifications, off the top of my head)... I'd say it's Aemon Targaryen. But the problem is that even in AGOT, he's already ancient and frail with no hope of offspring.

For the sake of the realm, in AFFC, I'd crown Tommen Baratheon and his wife Margaery.
 
Just to add to all that complication...

Tommen would be okay with a great Regent (like "Uncle" Jaime?), or someone besides Cersei.

Tyrion has impulsivity, packaging and smart mouth issues. But having a popular consort and coming in, flying a dragon, would alleiviate some of his PR problems.

Dany seems to be growing into her role, and Tyrion could be a great help, and might be loyal to her as a consort or Hand, if he respects her. She can't provide an heir in the long run. Sansa or Margaery or Myrcella (or Arya--yikes!?) could assist.

Who would make the best military general in these troubled times? Jon? Jaime? Tyrion?
 
At about age 35, Jaime is just now learning patience, critical thinking, and justice... I think he'd make a poor regent.

General? As far as I can tell, only Tyrion and Dany are the only commanders unbeaten in the field. And as for generals... Lord Tarly and the Blackfish are the best.
 
I've thought for some time that Jon might end up with a crown, and I think he'd be able to handle it. I wouldn't be shocked to see Tyrion as his hand.
 
Sigh, I suppose Boaz is right about Jaime as the regent, at this point. His dashing ways had turned my head!
I suppose the ruler can be a good commander(and yes I suppose Dany has this experience) and not have to be a general or lead from the front. (Dragons could change things). I think it helps if the king is a warrior in this bunch, though. I would like to see Randal Tarley bend the knee to Dany! The Blackfish would probably be onside, if it were Dany, don't you think?

Maybe Dany as the last Targ, could rule, and Tommen could succeed her as long as the curse doesn't get him first.
 
Don't get me wrong regarding the Lord Commander of the Kingsguard, the Warden of the East, and the Generalissimo of the Seven Kingdoms. He already possesses tremendous power and authority. And he is starting to mature emotionally, romantically, and intellectually... But Jaime is starting a bit late in life, I don't think he's going to mature fast enough to save Tommen or himself.

I do not foresee any possible reconciliation between any descendents of Aerys II and the descendents of Robert Baratheon and Tywin Lannister. Dany cannot afford to make peace with Cersei or Jaime. No, she would never forgive the Kingslayer nor allow Baratheon claimants (real or fake) to live because she, herself, is a living example of what will happen. Edric Storm might be the first Baratheon/Lannister that Dany gets her hands on and it'll be interesting to see what she does with him.

Now I know you're thinking, Boaz, you're forgetting Tyrion... He's already on his way to see Dany and you know he's Tywin's son! Well, I'll tell you that I don't believe that Tyrion is Tywin's son. I believe he's Dany's *******, elder half-brother. Tyrion is on my short list to be one of the heads of the dragon... I mean who wants to be a Hand, when you can be a Head?
 
Varys. He'd probably make a good king. Of course he can't get an heir, so that'd be a problem. But I think he's competent enough to name an heir early and train it properly. Of all the characters I could think of I think he'd be able to handle the turmoil and everything best if he could gain office. But that won't happen.

I don't like any of the likely rulers. Tommen is young and perhaps fixable, but none of the possible regents would be helpful. Tyrion killed his father, so I don't think he'll be taking over, and he's hated by the little people and most nobles alike. I don't like Dany, and I don't think she knows how to rule a town let alone a continent. Plus no heir again. Jon, who is possibly Robb's heir, doesn't seem to like ruling.

Perhaps they should just scrap the whole monarchy thing.
 
Hodor for king. Just give him a great King's Council made up of all the smartest men and you basically have a constitutional monarchy.

Or you know, Eddard Stark might be a pretty good candidate. Honourable, firm but fair, doesn't take sh!t from anyone. Also the North liked him and we can guess he would have had even more support than Robb, so he certainly has that X Factor where men want to follow him.
 
Again, I find myself in bed with Boaz (roll over why don't you and stop hogging the blankets!!). I go with Tyrion. The best ruler Westeros will never have. I too see him as one of the Heads of the Dragon.

My other considerations would go to Danny for her natural abilities and sense of justice, Doran Martell for his cunning and similar qualities to Tyrion and Sansa Stark who is learning very quickly who to rule and deceive from papa Littlefinger but remains a Stark at heart.

Finally, I have always said that there is so much emphasis in this series on the position of bastards in society that I a ******* will in the end sit on the Iron Throne. That person is likely to be Jon Snow. He has all the right stuff and with Tyrion, they would be a great team indeed.
 
Alrighty then,

Constitutional Monarchy: King Hodor, Queen Sansa and Prime Minister Jon Snow

Republic: President Dolorous Edd Tollet, First Lady Mrs Sansa Tollet, Vice President Petyr Baelish

Communist: Chairman Roose Bolton, Citizen Walder Frey, Citizen Baelish

Fascist: Generalissimo Walder Frey, Minister Roose Bolton, General Randal Tarley

Tribal: Euron, Uncat, Gregor Clegane

Fantasy: The Dragon Throne, Queen Dany, King Jon, King Tyrion,
 
Again, I find myself in bed with Boaz (roll over why don't you and stop hogging the blankets!!). I go with Tyrion. The best ruler Westeros will never have. I too see him as one of the Heads of the Dragon.
First Boaz admitted that he would like to go on a date with Renly and now this... Boaz has left the closet! :D

I agree about Tyrion, he is the best ruler. The only problem is that he is not charismatic enough for the mob.. The mob wants Brangelina style rulers.. and his enemies will use this against him. He will need to work really hard to earn people's love and respect.

I think Eddard is good only for something like Winterfell, he would never survive as a King of Westeros.
Jon is ok but too young and too.. Stark :) And I agree again that Jon and Tyrion would make a perfect team! And Dany's part would be to shut up and be beautiful :D
 
What about Mance Rayder? That would certainly turn Westeros on its head. :p
 
Well, Tysha, I had in mind more a certain (very funny) scene between John Candy (may he rest in peace) and Steve Martin from a classic comedy, Planes, Trains and Automobiles than a closet.

But to respond to Kith, your suggestion is interesting since we is a person so far removed from Westeros society but Mance Rayder? Really? Certainly would turn things on its head but the guy cound't even get across the Wall and he has zero charisma. Mance will burn. Now, one that is within a grasp of greater power and would certainly tuen Westeros on its head is Littlefinger.

Forget Obama and McCain. Vote Dolorous Edd for President!
 
Doesn't the name of 'The Winds of Winter' imply a Stark king on the Iron Throne? Or is it just my imagination and poor memory...

Anyways, there is no such thing as a best king. You can only strive to be better than the last. And assuming that Tommen didn't really do anything, then it's not hard to be better than him or Joffrey.

I'd personally give the crown to Stannis, if I knew of his claim. If I didn't then I'd have the High Septon decide between Stannis Baratheon, Edwyn Tully (the last of the supporters of the King of Winter), Mace Tyrell or Kevan Lannister.

If Ser Barristan was not held by oaths, he would be another great choice.
 
Not in order: Tywin, Tyrion, Stannis, Eddard (before his head left him), Robb (same as his daddy), Davos, Jon, Danaerys.
 
But Cincinnatus relenquished power almost as soon as he gained it?!?! Don't get me wrong... I think this attribute most admirable... this is why I hold George Washington in such high esteem... but Cincinnatus would never accept absolute rule as hereditary... so how could Willas rule like him?

Obvisously all that whiskey and beer from that wedding reception tonight went to my head. I'm missing something important in this connection.

Eulalia, if you would not mind explaining this comparison, I'd appreciate it. I'll read it in the morning when I'm sober.
 
A vote for a return to Reganomics is a vote for Littlefinger!

Heck yeah!
 

Similar threads


Back
Top