ASoFaI - "It's all sex and death"

knivesout said:
LeGuin has wisdom, and something to say about the human condition.

I've never read LeGuin but the implied point in this statement is that Martin does not have wisdom and/or something to say about the human condition.

I heartily disagree, I've learned more about people and relationships, the principle of honor and duty, and the wisdom of who is fit to rule, while reading GRRM than I have from any other fantasy series. He has more to say than you realize.
 
caladanbrood said:
I don't want to insult you're girlfriend's taste in books, Brian, but aSoIaF is so far above LeGuin quality wise it may be difficult to adapt, like you said;)

Nah, she just finds it very jarring jumping between writing styles. Usually takes her quite a few chapters to settle into the narrative style. I figure it's not too uncommon when you read books back to back. :)
 
I said:
Nah, she just finds it very jarring jumping between writing styles. Usually takes her quite a few chapters to settle into the narrative style. I figure it's not too uncommon when you read books back to back. :)

Yeah, that same phenomenon happens to me quite often. Going from Tom Robbins to Robin Hobb to Tad Williams and now Nicolai Gogol is quite jarring. That's why it's always good to reread a series right before the next volume comes out. You'll be right in line with that writer's style and ready to enjoy the book to its fullest.
 
I think it is more like the "sex and death" show the reader exactly how harsh this setting is, and there is no better way to convey that except through real human emotion. Sex and death bring instinctive emotion to any human being and only a true master, such as Martin, can use that to their advantage so it does not seem to be there just to sell the books.

Few writers have ever been able to make me cry from reading their stories, Martin is one of them, and Robin Hobb is another.

Sincerely,

Rahl Windsong
 
Hi Rahl Windsong, and welcome to the chronicles network. :)

She still complains that it is very masculine, but she's asked me to order the third volume, so even I'll have to catch up now. :)
 
The problem I had when I read A Clash of Kings was that A Storm of Swords was not even near completed when I was finished. So like A feast for Crows I had to wait patiently for the next part, and have again been waiting...not so patiently for the 4th!

The only thing I can take comfort in, as I wait, is the 1300+ pages of goodness that I know already exsist! By the way would anyone know what 1300+ pages of final draft would be in the published book? Or perhaps more to the right number of 1500+ by the time he is done with it. How long would the book itself be once published? Speculation of course! :)
 
a|one said:
ASoIaF is as you say, more based on the relationships between characters than plot or "quest". But why would this mean it is more appealing to one gender/age than to another? Everyone has relationships and so everyone can relate.

I think what is meant here is that a "quest" plotline is more engaging for younger audiences, for the most part because of attention spans and the fact that many younger people's lives aren't usually involved in thoughtful and deep relationships that most adults come to know and relate to. Naturally, there are some exceptions in both cases. My brother first read AGoT at age eleven, and my dad just read it at 57- both loved it. I suppose the nature of the reader comes into play as well.

As for the series being "all sex and death," why yes, it is. One more reason to love it. A quick look at history and life reveals that much of our past and present revolves around sex and death. Just take a look at any newspaper and that's pretty much standard on the front page. But the lovely thing about GRRM is that he encompasses all of the aspects of life- not just sex and death, but also pain, sorrow, betrayal, grief, loss, triumph, love (not the sappy kind, but the real kind), and all of the weaknesses and strengths that are driving forces in our lives. Sometimes lighter reading is fun, I agree. But for the most part, I suppose what I love the most about GRRM is that I can relate not only to his characters' personalities, but more importantly to what they feel.:)
 
The main difference between GRRM and typical fantasy writers is the absoltue level of authenticity in every aspect of his story. Be it the characters, the history, the description of the scenery, everything feels real and hard, not fake and soft. Some people dont like this because they are more attracted to books that focus on escapism, and unrealistic plots that make them feel better. Some of us are more interested in stripping away the layers of fakeness and finding something that feels real, and this is what GRRM gives us.
 
a|one said:
The main difference between GRRM and typical fantasy writers is the absoltue level of authenticity in every aspect of his story. Be it the characters, the history, the description of the scenery, everything feels real and hard, not fake and soft. Some people dont like this because they are more attracted to books that focus on escapism, and unrealistic plots that make them feel better. Some of us are more interested in stripping away the layers of fakeness and finding something that feels real, and this is what GRRM gives us.

Exactly! When I am reading ASoIaF, any of the books, I feel as though I can actually picture in my mind what it is like. I can see through the eyes of his characters and without the sex and death it would not seem so realistic. I have said it before and I will say it again...

Surely the Seven Kingdoms do exists somewhere, and more than anywhere else, in our own minds.

If someone has to make another epic fantasy story into a movie I hope and pray it is ASoIaF and that I live to see that, be it good or otherwise.

Rahl
 

Similar threads


Back
Top