Brys
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 813
I'm really ambivalent about this. I've just finished the book, and while I quite enjoyed it, I'm not quite sure why. On the whole it was pretty derivative, predictable writing with mainly two-dimensional characters and at best average prose. But it was still fun. And it seemed like it had a lot of potential - very much a debut novel. The idea was an interesting one, and it seemed that a lot of the characters could be developed a lot further and it could be a book similar to Rothfuss, but he never quite followed through.
The characters do appear to be more complex than your standard fantasy stereotypes, but he never goes far enough with it. If he was just a little more willing to make Arlen a real anti-hero and abandon a lot of the good/evil dichotomy this could be a much much better book. At the start he's too much just a whiny character without much depth to his motivations, though after he leaves Miln he begins to become more interesting. Rojer was poorly written I thought, far too much a standard fantasy cliche, and Leesha had some potential, but in the end her mother seemed a more interesting character than her.
I also got the feeling that everything suddenly became much too easy for him. Why was none of this ever tried before? Painting wards on weapons/armour/body seems so obvious, its ridiculous no one even tried it before he did, particularly amongst the Krasians. I can see why it would be hard to win any full fledged war against the demons - but to make life more tolerable and a lot easier would not have been hard in the larger cities.
So as I said, I enjoyed it, but not I'm not sure why, because it wasn't a great book. It wasn't a particularly bad one either, but it's not very original and it's not well written, and certainly not a challenge to the top end of epic fantasy writers, like Martin, Bakker, Erikson, or even Abercrombie, Keyes or Lynch. Rothfuss seemed a lot more accomplished than Brett, but despite all of those criticisms, I'm still optimistic - I think there's a lot of room for improvement, but it's something that is certainly within Brett's ability. The next book will tell.
The characters do appear to be more complex than your standard fantasy stereotypes, but he never goes far enough with it. If he was just a little more willing to make Arlen a real anti-hero and abandon a lot of the good/evil dichotomy this could be a much much better book. At the start he's too much just a whiny character without much depth to his motivations, though after he leaves Miln he begins to become more interesting. Rojer was poorly written I thought, far too much a standard fantasy cliche, and Leesha had some potential, but in the end her mother seemed a more interesting character than her.
I also got the feeling that everything suddenly became much too easy for him. Why was none of this ever tried before? Painting wards on weapons/armour/body seems so obvious, its ridiculous no one even tried it before he did, particularly amongst the Krasians. I can see why it would be hard to win any full fledged war against the demons - but to make life more tolerable and a lot easier would not have been hard in the larger cities.
So as I said, I enjoyed it, but not I'm not sure why, because it wasn't a great book. It wasn't a particularly bad one either, but it's not very original and it's not well written, and certainly not a challenge to the top end of epic fantasy writers, like Martin, Bakker, Erikson, or even Abercrombie, Keyes or Lynch. Rothfuss seemed a lot more accomplished than Brett, but despite all of those criticisms, I'm still optimistic - I think there's a lot of room for improvement, but it's something that is certainly within Brett's ability. The next book will tell.