Danny McG
"Anything can happen in the next half hour!"
The Stand - full revised version
Is it really that much better than the original release? That was good (and big) enough.The Stand - full revised version
I wouldn't say that much better, just a bit longer and a few minor characters a bit more fleshed out.Is it really that much better than the original release? That was good (and big) enough.
I never read The Stand, but I heard it was one of his best books.
My favorite book of his that I read (or tried to read) was Hearts in Atlantis. It might be a surprising pick, it is VERY different from his usual writing. My favorite story is probably The Body (a.k.a. Stand By Me the movie), which was loosely based on his own childhood.
I guess I'll check it out sometime!Its a great book one the best Post apocalyptic novels ever written.
I guess I'll check it out sometime!
Technically, another favorite of his for me is his book 'On Writing'... I didn't like it, but I learned quite a bit from it.
Fun fact, and some of you guys probably know this, but apparently he has no recollection of writing his book 'Cujo', because he was crazy high at the time. :/
I'll make a note. The Jack London one sounds interesting.Off topic for a second
.... Earth Abides by George R Stewart ..... Swann Song by Robert McCammeron ..... The Star Rover by Jack London
Back on topic just finished Kings book The Running Man. Way better then the movie.
I'll make a note. The Jack London one sounds interesting.
And Stephen King didn't write Running Man... that was Richard Bachman (definitely not Stephen King ) - apparently he wrote it all in 24 hours, probably also under the influence? (Great film, by the way, one of Arnie's best!) I should check out the book one day.
Haha, I can see that! That may be a little more than I can handle anytime soon, but thanks for the suggestions!Also Robert McCamerons Swan Song truly a great apocalyptic epic.
Sorry, I'm a chronic book recommender.
Haha, I can see that! That may be a little more than I can handle anytime soon, but thanks for the suggestions!
I'll make a note. The Jack London one sounds interesting.
And Stephen King didn't write Running Man... that was Richard Bachman (definitely not Stephen King ) - apparently he wrote it all in 24 hours, probably also under the influence? (Great film, by the way, one of Arnie's best!) I should check out the book one day.
Being a middle-aged person, I'm more familiar with his older books, and reread them at intervals. In my opinion his best work is not his 'spookiest'. Misery is brilliant. The Tommyknockers is a good scifi story. And some of his short stories are the scariest things I've ever read.
Not all his stuff is long - Carrie, Firestarter, Dead Zone, Cujo and Pet Sematery are all normal length books. There may well be others.
How about 11/22/63?
I thought it was brilliant. The time travel aspect was beautifully handled, with wonderful attention to detail (the way food tasted way back when, for example). i also loved the fact that the protagonist didn't just pop into the past to carry out his mission - he had to stay there for five years, building a whole new life from scratch.
Plus, the two main characters are hugely appealing and I really cared about them. It's not too often you see that in genre fiction. And of course it helps if you like time travel, which I do - and the Kennedy assassination, which I've read a lot about. Some readers may find parts of the book a bit long, but for me it was almost perfect.
Cell is a good short novel. A bit like a mini Stand. The film is utterly awful though.
Any other author and I would agree, but unlike the movies which tend to get sequels, King isn't an author who does follow-up novels, although he often references earlier stuff in later,unconnected, works. Less 'happy' endings would also be a bonus!I thought Cell was fabulous. Although for me it seemed to end very quickly, almost as though a Cell 2 was in the pipeline which would have been amazing!