Here's my review of The City and the City
This book arrived on my shelves enveloped in controversy. Ithad just been awarded two science fiction awards, nominated for more, and yetjournalists were asking if it was really science fiction or just a crime novelwith added dimensions. If I thought it was akin to when Margaret Atwood is indenial of her obvious-to-most science fiction writing, then I’d be wrong: Chinainsists that everything he writes is science fiction and that any discussion ofsuch niceties is ‘silly’. But it isn’t silly when he wins awards set aside forscience fiction works.
Reading the blurb, I was both pleased and gutted. Pleasedanyway because I relish China’s love of the art of writing. I am not one whothinks the author should be invisible and there are phrases China uses thatmakes me stop and admire his skill. Pleased also because of the premise: twocities occupy the same physical space and yet the occupants of one city‘cannot’ see those of the other; nor their buildings and vehicles. I was guttedbecause it seemed to me this is a story where parallel universes meet at acity-size intersection, and I wanted to write such a story. The two cities, Beszeland Ul Qoma, have different architecture, language and social mores yet shareknowledge of the rest of the world. So they all know who Tom Hanks is, and can travelto the same Britain, Canada and the US. The notion of parallel universes and a possibleintersection is certainly a concept within the bounds of Quantum Physics andhence science fiction. For an undeclared reason it is illegal for the citizensof either city to see each other. It appears that if this happens they commit abreach of protocol and a particularly powerful body called Breach punishesthem. This becomes complicated because how can someone drive along a road thatis in both cities but has to unsee vehicles and buildings belonging to theother city? Accidents happen and Breach swoops. To me there are manycontradictions in this aspect of the plot – it is too easy for naughty childrento throw stones at windows of either or both cities, committing Breach all overthe place. CCTV is referred to but the logical consequences aren’t. That is:how can anyone view a photograph of the city without noticing cars, people andbuildings from the other city?
But wait. First let’s praise where it is due.
Mostly, this is an extraordinarily well-crafted crime storywith three main characters – police from the two cities – who are alive andcredible. You can tell who is talking from their speech patterns andmannerisms, faultless. Love the idea that a policeman from one city is neededto help solve a murder that takes place in the other. The victim is crucial tounravelling the mystery of the two cities and it seems there are groups eagerto keep the secret. China does a terrifically moving job of making the twodetectives distrust then come to admire each other, in their own way.Brilliant. Generally, an author has his work cut out to describe one uniquecity so that the reader believes they are there, but here two cities arecreated in the same spot. Excellent and original. I would have liked more fleshon the character of the protagonist, Borlu. We are told he has two women, whodon’t know each other but we feel more for his assistant. There are times whenhe should be scared stiff yet isn’t. When his Breach officer is shot, he shouldhave been worried that the other Breach would suspect him but he seems to beunaware. I like his character though I think I made up more than was revealedin the novel.
You need to have a good imagination to appreciate The City & The City and to keephaving one to the end. It isn’t a light read even though it is fast paced. I’dlike to say that I walk about my own city (Chester) wondering if I am inanother parallel city but hadn’t noticed before. Yes, we all go through lifehalf blind to architectural niches in a too-familiar town, but it isn’t thesame. The inhabitants of both cities in TC&TC have been indoctrinated frombirth to unsee the other and know they have been. This is hard to take on – itlacks credibility in a modern society with TV and international travel evenwith a tough Breach enforcement.
If having two different cities occupying the samegeographical space isn’t hard enough there may be another, Orciny, which wasthere before the two started. There is a hint that an alien force created theconditions for Beszel and Ul Qoma to develop separately and unseeing from theancient original. If anyone discovers the truth there could be disastrousconsequences – in my imagination and with Quantum Mechanics in mind, I thoughtperhaps the true knowledge of each other might snuff out one or both. Ratherlike a Schrödinger Cat experiment. Because of Breach and indoctrination, suchthoughts are outlawed, but there are factions. Great geopolitics here, withgroups wanting unification, others demanding either Beszel or Ul Qoma as thetrue city.
Before I say why the ending disappointed me, I have topraise the writing. Breach are specially trained security – they areexpressionless, reinforced to make them different to the normal police ofeither city. “Their faces were without anything approaching expressions. Theylooked like people-shaped clay in the moments before God breathed out.”
Phrases I wished I’d written: “Silence went through theroom, leaving itself behind.” “...was addressed to me, prisoner, condemned,consultant.” The juxtaposition of opposites there very well done, and when youread it in context, apt.
Maybe it is because I jumped to the parallel QM conclusiontoo early and eagerly waited for such an exposition, I was becoming anxiousnear the end. By half way I’d written it differently – I’d have had the messingwith the seeing / unseeing of and by the citizens of each city create a suddencoming to a mathematical point, an elimination of one or both. In the end,nothing so exciting (for me) happened. It kind of fizzled out as if Chinadidn’t know how to finish the novel – an outrageous point of view I know, andimprobable. Right from the start, the QM aspects kept the book firmly asScience Fiction. Then, in the last few pages we find that it was all a con. Noparallel dimensions, no QM, Breach and the indoctrination is all that keeps thetwo cities going. What? That to me is far too contrived. I cannot believe adual system kept in place by force and culture like that. Fair enough,Apartheid kind of did, but in an obvious way, not with unseeing and all the contradictionsthat throws up. I am disappointed at the end, but I would struggle to say thenovel isn’t Science Fiction. In manyways it is with the original concepts, alt history, and possibilities.
The City & TheCity is a great crime story for readers with intelligence and admiration oflateral thinking. Maybe it is worthy of the Clarke Award, but I hope it isn’t asign that future Science Fiction will follow suit. Not that I want all my SFreading to have aliens and rockets, but I don’t want to watch a film of Raiders of the Lost Ark to end with a‘sorry there was never an Ark in the first place’ either.