- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 8,053
I agree with pretty much everyone else!
Regarding massively successful books of the Brown type (which are by nature anomalies), I'm with SJAB. It seems to me that most of them tap into some sort of deep-seated need or interest many people have: an ideal (!) boyfriend, the not-quite-supernatural occulty conspiracy theories many people half-believe, an imaginary life as some sort of tough guy, an idealised schooldays with magic and so on. Writing style and quality may vary, but as OMGIR says, it will suffice for the task at the very least. But these are anomalies, as are the reports of "1st time author gets record advance", which are quite often massaged into exciting news articles from the more mundane truth.
There are some bad books out there, but there are a lot of good ones. The average novel isn't bad and isn't amazing: it does the job and usually fairly well, much like the average rock song, or the average shed. Several years ago I probably felt that publishing was a closed shop, but did keep trying and it's paid off.
Added to the factors mentioned already, I'd include "the market". I don't know if a book like The Lies of Locke Larmora would have got published 10 or 20 years ago: the market may have been different then. But quality does matter, very much so.
Regarding massively successful books of the Brown type (which are by nature anomalies), I'm with SJAB. It seems to me that most of them tap into some sort of deep-seated need or interest many people have: an ideal (!) boyfriend, the not-quite-supernatural occulty conspiracy theories many people half-believe, an imaginary life as some sort of tough guy, an idealised schooldays with magic and so on. Writing style and quality may vary, but as OMGIR says, it will suffice for the task at the very least. But these are anomalies, as are the reports of "1st time author gets record advance", which are quite often massaged into exciting news articles from the more mundane truth.
There are some bad books out there, but there are a lot of good ones. The average novel isn't bad and isn't amazing: it does the job and usually fairly well, much like the average rock song, or the average shed. Several years ago I probably felt that publishing was a closed shop, but did keep trying and it's paid off.
Added to the factors mentioned already, I'd include "the market". I don't know if a book like The Lies of Locke Larmora would have got published 10 or 20 years ago: the market may have been different then. But quality does matter, very much so.