Speaking of the serial comma...
I have to say, I am a fan of the serial comma. I like the way (most of the time) it's clear, as in:
My parrot swears like a trooper, fake burps, and gives me the V with his claws.
I ate fish and chips, pie and peas, and vanilla ice-cream.
Rather than:
My parrot swears like a trooper, fake burps and gives me the V with his claws.
I ate fish and chips, pie and peas and vanilla ice-cream.
I dunno. There's somthing annoying about leaving off the last comma, to me. "I saw a rabbit, a hare and a camel in my garden."
I mean, you're writing a
list, are you not? Then yes, I WILL separate off
all my items, thank you very much!!! I actually wonder if all this nonsense of no-serial-commas has come about because of the phrasing of Strunk and White's
Elements of Style, and such books, as in "In a series of three or more terms with a single conjunction, use a comma after each term except the last". Perhaps over the years people interpretted that as "no serial comma", not "don't put a comma AFTER the last element in your list, e.g. "I ate peas, chips, and fish[,] today for tea" or "Eating, breathing, and drinking[,] are good for you".
I'm not saying that's what Mr Strunk meant, but hey, it's my theory (that will probably be shredded to bits on here
).
???
Ooh, found this page on serials:
The Case of the Serial Comma--Solved! (I can see most people disagreeing with it, though.)