j d worthington
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2006
- Messages
- 13,889
niggourath: You raise some interesting possibilities for dealing with the Crawling Chaos there. I'll not answer for Wilum but, since I was given the privilege of reading the tale as it progressed, I think he did an excellent job of weaving various elements of presentations of Nyarlathotep together, including hints of his role in the Dreamlands... which are incorporated into the feel and essence of the story without ever being brought into center stage physically... which gives the tale an especially eerie, nightmarish feel quite suited to an entity who owes his own existence to a dream of his creator....
You do ask one question to which I have an answer, if not an exact one:
"He [Nyarlathotep] said he had risen up out of the blackness of twenty-seven centuries[....]"
As George T. Wetzel pointed out in his essay, "The Cthulhu Mythos: A Study" (1955, rev. 1971):
Joshi, on the other hand, has it as "the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt (940-730 BCE)" (The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories, p. 370, n. 1)... though I suppose the "22" may be a typo for "27" here....
By the way: Yes, Lovecraft's value as an educational tool is something which has not really been noted as much as it should; even his satirical verses are rich in such things, and prove a goldmine of reference and interpretation of historical, social, literary, political, and other matters if one reads them attentively. As Robert Bloch once put it, "Lovecraft was my university"; and I think something of that nature is still very true even today with at least some of his readers.
He did, now and again however, get things a bit off... as having the earth be seen from the moon's dark side in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath. (Though, again, one can perhaps build a case that this distortion is a part of the dreamlands milieu itself; in reality, though, given that this was a piece written without intent of anyone else ever seeing it, and never polished or revised, the most likely explanation is that he simply liked the image and found it both useful and atmospherically effective, so put it in there without thinking it through, and never went back and corrected it....)
You do ask one question to which I have an answer, if not an exact one:
His enigmatic involvement in the ancient egyptian society ,as according to Lovecraft, he arose there in those ancient times and possibly as a pharaoh-was that in the prerecorded part of the egyptian civilization,which was somewhere before 4000 b.c ,when the first written records (hieroglyphs) appeared.
"He [Nyarlathotep] said he had risen up out of the blackness of twenty-seven centuries[....]"
As George T. Wetzel pointed out in his essay, "The Cthulhu Mythos: A Study" (1955, rev. 1971):
This would place this god as having something to do with the twenty-fifth dynasty -- the Ethiopian invasion of Europe. Nyarlathotep must then have been incarnate in some Ethiopian ruler of Egypt -- must have been the driving power behind the Ethiopian armies that suddenly rose up and made their conquest.
-- Four Decades of Criticism, pp. 82-83
Joshi, on the other hand, has it as "the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt (940-730 BCE)" (The Call of Cthulhu and Other Weird Stories, p. 370, n. 1)... though I suppose the "22" may be a typo for "27" here....
By the way: Yes, Lovecraft's value as an educational tool is something which has not really been noted as much as it should; even his satirical verses are rich in such things, and prove a goldmine of reference and interpretation of historical, social, literary, political, and other matters if one reads them attentively. As Robert Bloch once put it, "Lovecraft was my university"; and I think something of that nature is still very true even today with at least some of his readers.
He did, now and again however, get things a bit off... as having the earth be seen from the moon's dark side in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath. (Though, again, one can perhaps build a case that this distortion is a part of the dreamlands milieu itself; in reality, though, given that this was a piece written without intent of anyone else ever seeing it, and never polished or revised, the most likely explanation is that he simply liked the image and found it both useful and atmospherically effective, so put it in there without thinking it through, and never went back and corrected it....)