antiloquax
Trans-MUTE!
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2011
- Messages
- 382
@Vertigo - thank goodness it's not just me! I thought I'd cracked it by trying to makes sure all the "author" fields in the metadata were formatted the same way but it still wouldn't play nice. I've decided to live with it (for now... ).
On a bit of a tangent ... I remember feeling a bit surprised by the emphasis on physical books in Solaris. Kelvin spends quite a lot of time in the library reading heft tomes of Solarist studies. I'm not criticising Lem for failing to predict that books would be on computers, I just remember wondering how much all those books weighed and the practicalities of taking them with you into space. Mind you, if you have a FTL "drive", maybe such things don't matter so much ...
There are big "libraries" in Greg Bear's Eonalso - although most of the data there is held on the computer.
Some readers might be interested in the book Double Fold by Nicholson Baker. In it he explores the fact that microfilming books and newspaper collections (and these days "digitising" them) often results in the destruction of the original book / newspaper. And the microfilm copies were often very poor quality, black and white only etc. Those of us who are ereaders know that OCR has its limitations .
It is surely inevitable that we will read and store books electronically more and more in the years to come. Which is not to say that our books "are dead". I think we'll come to see them in a similar way to the record collections of vinyl afficionados.
a
On a bit of a tangent ... I remember feeling a bit surprised by the emphasis on physical books in Solaris. Kelvin spends quite a lot of time in the library reading heft tomes of Solarist studies. I'm not criticising Lem for failing to predict that books would be on computers, I just remember wondering how much all those books weighed and the practicalities of taking them with you into space. Mind you, if you have a FTL "drive", maybe such things don't matter so much ...
There are big "libraries" in Greg Bear's Eonalso - although most of the data there is held on the computer.
Some readers might be interested in the book Double Fold by Nicholson Baker. In it he explores the fact that microfilming books and newspaper collections (and these days "digitising" them) often results in the destruction of the original book / newspaper. And the microfilm copies were often very poor quality, black and white only etc. Those of us who are ereaders know that OCR has its limitations .
It is surely inevitable that we will read and store books electronically more and more in the years to come. Which is not to say that our books "are dead". I think we'll come to see them in a similar way to the record collections of vinyl afficionados.
a