That joke was the pits.
When one is really in the pits, it's time to call Quatermass.
That joke was the pits.
The Rats by James Herbert scared me, but then I can't stand rats so it was never going to be an easy read. Herbert did a lot of cool horror but I think he lost his edge with later novels. Dean Koontz scared me a little with Odd Thomas (the first one) and the twist at the end was brilliant.
I read that one along time ago. Its a really good horror novel.
M.R. James is still hard to beat. And what about Le Fanu??
Is anyone actually scared by horror novels? This isn't a post criticising the genre, I don't read many horror novels just because I don't think they could achieve what I think they set out to do. However I could be wrong in their intentions.
Are horror stories meant to be scary or just have a horror implication? (like *real* vampires attacking kids or monsters from the bog stalking the abandoned amusement park etc.).
The last novel that freaked me out was Phantoms by Dean Koontz. Before that, it was probably R. L. Stine and his Goosebumps (that's how long ago I am talking).
I think the last horror book that scared me was back in elementary school - you know those Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark books? But I have to admit that was in large part because of those horrifying watercolor illustrations. Before that, I was a huge Goosebumps fan, but it never actually frightened me in the same way. Since then, I don't think I've read a horror book that has scared me, especially if it lacks the visual aspect. (And I agree that horror movies get much more flexibility since they can leverage jump scares and scary visuals to their advantage.)
I will say that the last book in general that creeped me out was a thriller that I read a while back - don't really remember the name - and what was scary about that was more the psychological nature of the thriller, about an intruder who keeps getting into young women's homes. The idea of that bothered me a lot - not that I hadn't seen it already in film and through other media, but in this particular book, something about the way it was described and the way the story was told was simply creepy.
So, I think psychological horror is the thing that creeps me out now in books, because through a textual medium you do have a good chance at really getting under the reader's skin and unsettling them. But this also means it can be very subjective, since people have different fears.
Me either. I prefer psychological horrorHorror is a really tricky genre to do well, so a genuinely scare book is hard to come by. I'm not too much a fan of gore.
The House on the Borderland and also by him Adrift on the Haunted Seas.
In a Lonely Place by Karl Edward Wagner