December's Deliciously Delirifacient Dabblings Into Fictional Diversions

I'll be reading her new anthology soon. I'm really looking forward to it; you're right about her prose.

The Book of the damned i got second hand from bookmooch and it has inspired me to read much more of Tanith Lee in 2012. I like her but havent read much yet.

I have ordered The Secret book of Paradys(omnibus), Night's Master and Tempting the Gods collection.

I look forward to going deeper in, losing myself in her weird, creepy stories.
 
Have just embarked upon The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern.

Have been looking forward to this one for a while!

xx

One of my friends has just finished this and he raves about it all the time now. Says I should read it.

I shall certainly give you my feedback O' Squeaky One!

Started it last night and so far so good, quite dark... having trouble putting it down! :D

xx

Excellent. :)

Just a quick update for you O' Squeaky One... I have now finished the book and have been thinking about how to describe it to you... all I can say is exquisite...

This is the first book in a very long time (fictional) that has kept me up into the early hours of the morning ravenously turning the pages and longing for it when it wasn't in my hands. I did try to make a point of reading it only at night time, when you read it you'll know why.

Simply put, I loved it, by far one of the best books I've read for a long long time.

Back to the thread... not sure what I'm picking up next. A Dance With Dragons is staring me sulkily but I just don't think I can bring myself to pick it up just yet... will hunt around my bookshelves and find something else I think. :D

xx
 
Just a quick update for you O' Squeaky One... I have now finished the book and have been thinking about how to describe it to you... all I can say is exquisite...

This is the first book in a very long time (fictional) that has kept me up into the early hours of the morning ravenously turning the pages and longing for it when it wasn't in my hands. I did try to make a point of reading it only at night time, when you read it you'll know why.

Simply put, I loved it, by far one of the best books I've read for a long long time.

Back to the thread... not sure what I'm picking up next. A Dance With Dragons is staring me sulkily but I just don't think I can bring myself to pick it up just yet... will hunt around my bookshelves and find something else I think. :D

xx

Looks like I'll have to get it then! I think 'exquisite' is the word my friend used too! And Amazon keep insisting that I'll like it.

(I'm doing exactly the same as you with ADWD, by the way!)
 
The Book of the damned i got second hand from bookmooch and it has inspired me to read much more of Tanith Lee in 2012. I like her but havent read much yet.

I have ordered The Secret book of Paradys(omnibus), Night's Master and Tempting the Gods collection.

I look forward to going deeper in, losing myself in her weird, creepy stories.

Are those books that type? I have Night's Master (and the rest of the Flat Earth) but no longer expect to like it and I'm unfamiliar with Tempting the Gods. In one sense, all her stuff is of a piece but, in another, I find portions of her stuff to be very different from others. I apparently don't like her standard fantasy or her fairytale type stuff or whatever. But I do sort of like her quirky semi-SF and may really like her sort of gothic weird tales - at least, Paradys seems interesting. I have hopes for her horror which I gather is more in the dark vein than the explicit gore vein. And does your Paradys omnibus include all four? I have two omnibi with two each. I've only managed to read the first pair (twice - I meant to re-read the first pair and read the second, but gave up when it took me so long to re-read - I still enjoyed the first two, but couldn't make myself re-read it quickly enough). As far as her style, I find that to be similarly diverse-within-a-relatively-narrow-range. I'm not impressed with her early fantasy style at all but her late gothic/weird style is good.
 
Are those books that type? I have Night's Master (and the rest of the Flat Earth) but no longer expect to like it and I'm unfamiliar with Tempting the Gods. In one sense, all her stuff is of a piece but, in another, I find portions of her stuff to be very different from others. I apparently don't like her standard fantasy or her fairytale type stuff or whatever. But I do sort of like her quirky semi-SF and may really like her sort of gothic weird tales - at least, Paradys seems interesting. I have hopes for her horror which I gather is more in the dark vein than the explicit gore vein. And does your Paradys omnibus include all four? I have two omnibi with two each. I've only managed to read the first pair (twice - I meant to re-read the first pair and read the second, but gave up when it took me so long to re-read - I still enjoyed the first two, but couldn't make myself re-read it quickly enough). As far as her style, I find that to be similarly diverse-within-a-relatively-narrow-range. I'm not impressed with her early fantasy style at all but her late gothic/weird style is good.

I wasnt overly impressed with early book of her like Birthgrave but i thought Cyrion was fun,solid S&S but her prose gets much finer in her weird,gothic stories. I got Paradys omnibus with all 4 books. You are right you cant read the Paradys book im reading too quickly. I read it slowly, you have to slow down like reading poetry. I enjoy it alot but i thought i have read over 100 pages but i see i have read like 50 pages. Its dense, like 1800s dense classic novel.

Night's Master is like Dying Earth like fantasy by and it has won her acclaim,awards and i look forward to that. It being compared to Vance classic series makes it sound very appealing. I do at times think of Vance when i read her. Not similar style but prose stylist in similar SFF stories.

Tempting the Gods is the only good in print collection i found of her early stories. Apparently they are different types of stories. SF,historical fantasy,darker fantasy like Paradys. I got this collection to sample her other stories, genres i havent read.
 
I've got about halfway through that issue of The Philosopher, and it has been quite interesting. Along with material by various amateur colleagues in general, this has the only substantial piece I've seen by a former correspondent of HPL's, Ira A. Cole, a Westerner whom Lovecraft describes in a letter as:

a strange and brilliant character -- an utterly illiterate ranchman and ex-cowboy of Western Kansas who possessed a streak of brilliant poetic genius. he was a sort of protegé [sic] of the more literate amateurs, and came to acquire a surprising amount of scholarship himself. His imagination was the most weird and active I have ever seen in any human being. But in the end that very streak of overdeveloped imagination and emotionalism was his aesthetic undoing. worked upon by a hectic and freakish "Pentecostal" revivalist, he "got religion" and became an absolutely impossible fanatic in his eccentric sect. He even reached the hallucination stage -- he fancied strange voices spoke gospel messages through his tongue -- in languages he did not understand. He is a Pentecostal preacher and small farmer now, living in Boulder, Colorado. He is quite dead to amateur journalism -- but what a meteor he was in his heyday!

The piece here is titled "A Vision of the Plains", and is what HPL referred to in another letter as "a Co[le] romance of reincarnation"... and it bears a striking resemblance in tone, style, construction, and various other characteristics to some of Robert E. Howard's tales, especially those of James Allison or "The People of the Dark" (particularly the latter). While not as long or as well-developed or finished as Howard's tales of this type, it is nonetheless quite an impressive piece, and exemplifies all the things Lovecraft said about Cole's poetic imagination.

The first publication of "Polaris", by the way, has a slight difference from the later versions, in that the bit of verse, or the chant by the "demonic" star upon which the tale hinges, is different in the final two lines than the version usually seen. This was due to feedback by a British amateur when Lovecraft was part of the Transatlantic Circulator, writing lengthy philosophical and critical letters to that correspondence group, as well as the members exchanging their writings for critique by others. The later version is an improvement artistically, though scarcely altering the broader meaning of the passage; but it does have a more disturbing ring to it than this version, nonetheless....
 
Tempting the Gods is the only good in print collection i found of her early stories. Apparently they are different types of stories. SF,historical fantasy,darker fantasy like Paradys. I got this collection to sample her other stories, genres i havent read.

Yeah, her short fiction is kind of oddly collected and not all that easy to find. (I mean, much of the Paradys stuff is short fiction, but I mean more her magazine pieces and more independent things.) I have The Gorgon to read someday.

On my actual current reading, I finished Rudy Rucker's Spacetime Donuts (1981). This was his first novel, 2/3 of which was published in a magazine (1978-9) which folded before the last third came out, and that didn't come out until after his first book novel, White Light (1980), which narrowly missed my top ten this year and could just as well have been on it. Since this is still 2011, I also have this one to (almost) add. In ways, this is even better than WL and, had I read it when I was a teenager, I would probably recall it as one of my all-time favorites. As is, I still enjoyed it a lot.

The spacetime donut and the multiverse are core concepts. Even minor asides like the anti-rockets (or "suckers") are fun (however implausible): micro-black-hole-powered T-shaped tubes one can ride on - at least as cool as a jet pack and quieter and virtually-infinitely fueled. The main sociological elements are the usual Great Computer and the revolution against it. Rucker is often lumped with the cyberpunks but isn't quite, really, but this is a very cyberpunky book in this plotline. It's a strength of this book that it's a bit more purposefully plotted than WL, but also a weakness in that it's a sketchily conceived dystopia and revolution. (The blurb describes the Brave New World-style dystopia thusly: "Free drugs! Easy sex! No job hassles! Some people just don't know when they're being oppressed!") The all-powerful computer (called Phizwhiz, to give an idea) is nowhere near all-powerful and what should be a world-wide (or cosmos-wide) revolution comes across as basically an anarchic city. But it's still consistently hugely entertaining, frequently mind-expanding, frequently funny, and has the occasional bits of wisdom. When contemplating the size of the city laid out before him while hanging on to his sucker, the protagonist thinks how big it is and how hard it will be to organize: "Let it be, a voice in Vernor's mind seemed to say, you don't have to organize other people's lives. But what if they're a**holes, he asked. And what if you are, the voice answered."

Be warned, if strong language, sex, and violence put you off, this is not recommended. Otherwise, it's very much so.
 
Rudy Rucker is awesome, and I love his old books. I liked Spacetime Donuts, and White Light is on my all-time top 10 list. I'm not really a fan of anything (fiction) he's done post Frek and the Elixer, although I do really want to read his autobiography, and his non-fiction is still brilliant.
 
Hm, interesting. I've read White Light, Spacetime Donuts, Master of Space and Time, and the first two Ware books, and pretty much love 'em all. I have Gnarl and the last two Ware books. I was thinking about tracking down The Sex Sphere and The Secret of Life and being satisfied with that (in the sense of actively seeking out - not in the sense of refusing if I stumbled over them) because, for whatever reason, I'd also gotten the idea that his later stuff wasn't up to par. But where's early/late? Are any of Hollow/Hacker/Saucer/Spaceland/Frek really great or just "still good"? For some reason, while I was a Poe fan, Hollow didn't sound like it'd appeal to me, or Saucer. The other three I've heard less about.
 
Looks like I'll have to get it then! I think 'exquisite' is the word my friend used too! And Amazon keep insisting that I'll like it.

(I'm doing exactly the same as you with ADWD, by the way!)

I hope you do like it...

hehehe... glad to hear I'm not the only one that just can't bring themselves to pick up ADWD...

I have instead opted for a possibly larger but more easy going book...

The Wise Man's Fear by Patrick Rothfuss...

xx
 
Just finished Jack Vance's "Eyes of the Overworld" and now on to Philip K. Dick's "Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said" for what will probably be my last book of the year.

I'm hoping from something really good from PKD who's last two novels I read left me somewhat disappointed ("Dr. Bloodmoney" & "VALIS").
 
So I'm actually having a really hard time enjoying this newest Merkabah Rider book, and not because of the fiction. The stories are still very cool and interesting.

It's because of all the typos and terrible formatting. I'm wondering if the book was even edited?

Misspelled words abound, missing punctuation marks are far too frequent, and after the first episode in the book there are no longer paragraph breaks signifying time and scene changes.

I'm not sure where to place the blame, but I'm really disappointed by it all.
 
Wait - you were disappointed by VALIS as well?

Holy crap!

:D

Man, we must look for entirely different things when it comes to PKD. ;)
 
Death Mask and Eulogy, by J.M. McDermott

So this was my first Kindle experience, and I loved it: both the book and reading it on the Kindle. I think I will soon find myself completely addicted to buying short little literary singles from authors, especially if authors like McDermott continue to support the format and release high quality works of fiction at affordable prices.

The best compliment I can give to Death Mask and Eulogy is that I wish it were longer, and I almost never say that about a book. DMaE is a novelette, just a tad longer than a short story, and it tells a story dealing with death, focusing on the reverence, fear, and absurdities surrounding the rituals the living perform for the dead.

McDermott's style here is more simple and threadbare than it is in Last Dragon and Never Knew Another, and it works perfectly to convey the story's world and characters. It is an interesting choice seeing as how many of the characters are artists to the extreme, but rather than drown the reader in purple prose with ornate, flowery description, McDermott chooses a minimalistic style.

I hope that McDermott is successful with these short releases, because I definitely want to read more from him.
 
Back to the thread... not sure what I'm picking up next. A Dance With Dragons is staring me sulkily but I just don't think I can bring myself to pick it up just yet

(I'm doing exactly the same as you with ADWD, by the way!)

hehehe... glad to hear I'm not the only one that just can't bring themselves to pick up ADWD... ...

Humble suggestion: get it over with.

It's neither as utterly dreadful as you fear, nor is it anywhere near as good as the preceding volumes (particularly the first 3). It's 'a' book, and it's Fantasy. And it features characters you might be familiar with from A Song of Ice and Fire. That probably about sums it up.

Enjoy!
 
Humble suggestion: get it over with.

It's neither as utterly dreadful as you fear, nor is it anywhere near as good as the preceding volumes (particularly the first 3). It's 'a' book, and it's Fantasy. And it features characters you might be familiar with from A Song of Ice and Fire. That probably about sums it up.

Enjoy!

Oh it's not for want of trying, I've picked it up and read the first 3/4 chapters around 3 times now and I just can't get the energy to plough through the remainder of it. I need to be in a certain place to go back to that world and immerse myself in the characters again and I'm just not there.

Another thing about it is that the gap has been too long, I loved books 1 through 5 (4) and my hunger for them was insatiable but all these years later, the hunger just isn't there, I feel like I'm reading it purely to finish the story. Once I get over that, I'll pick it up.

xx
 
Wait - you were disappointed by VALIS as well?

Holy crap!

:D

Man, we must look for entirely different things when it comes to PKD. ;)
I quite liked VALIS, but I was hoping for something of the calibre of "Scanner Darkly" and didn't get it so it was disappointing in that sense.
 
I'm reading Diary of a Wimpy Kid, my daughter enjoyed it and it's a bit of a laugh. But I'm on another business trip and only brought reports to read. although I do have Tobacco Stained Mountain Goat on my iPad if I need something to read.

I just finished Use of Weapons and enjoyed it much more the second time around, despite some recent criticism of it.
 
I quite liked VALIS, but I was hoping for something of the calibre of "Scanner Darkly" and didn't get it so it was disappointing in that sense.

I sort of had the same thing but in reverse!

I'm a big fan of Flow my tears... though, so would be interested in seeing how you get on.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads


Back
Top