Cinematic-ally, I would agree.Good heavens, this rocks!
That is all.
Ha! Ha! You make a valid point though. It looks like the ship has avatars. It was bad enough when Enterprise was meant to be a forerunner of Star Trek.In a prequel to Alien, shouldn't the ship be run by a ZX80 linked to a telex machine?
Ah! But Aliens was so good, and yet so completely different, that I forgave James Cameron.For me, Alien is one of those few films where the world should unite to agree that there should be no sequels, prequels, or anything else.
True. I'll go and see it anyway, I'm such a pushover.But a modern film that's essentially a 50's SF contact short story has to be better than an SF-as-excuse-for-stunts-and-effects film that the genre seems to have become in modern Hollywood. If not exactly original, it should at least be thoughful.
They still look a little... invasive... parasitical?Ridley Scott said that this movie is focused on the space jockey alien, not the aliens we all know...
...Why?For me, Alien is one of those few films where the world should unite to agree that there should be no sequels, prequels, or anything else.
Not wanting to answer for Mr Palmer, but I watched Alien on the box the other night and it took me back to that time when I was a young teen going to see it at night, and jaysus if it didn't scare the terwilligers out of me. The atmosphere of that movie has never ever been recaptured. It was the ultimate suspense thriller. Cameron just made an action flick....Why?
Dave- I thought you were calling me your ally in all things cinematic just then! But I do see what you mean, yes. But a modern film that's essentially a 50's SF contact short story has to be better than an SF-as-excuse-for-stunts-and-effects film that the genre seems to have become in modern Hollywood. If not exactly original, it should at least be thoughful.
i can't wait for this! i luv ridley's films - he has not disappointed me yet. i haven't clicked on the trailer link in the OP, tho, as i'm worried about spoilers.